Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25004295›Full record

SynthesisArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy in cholelithiasis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Paula Marcela Vilela Castro, Denise Akerman, Carolina Brito Munhoz, Iara do Sacramento, Mônica Mazzurana, Guines Antunes Alvarez

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of laparoscopic knot training in a silicone model.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. MORTALITY OF URGENCY VERSUS ELECTIVE VIDEOLAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery
    Article
  11. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMMUNOLOGICAL PROFILES IN WOMEN UNDERGOING CONVENTIONAL AND SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery
    Article
  12. HOSPITALIZATIONS FOR CHOLECYSTITIS AND CHOLELITHIASIS IN THE STATE OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL, BRAZIL.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paula Marcela Vilela CastroDepartament of General Surgery, Guilherme Álvaro Hospital, UNILUS, Santos, SP, Brazil.
Denise AkermanDepartament of General Surgery, Guilherme Álvaro Hospital, UNILUS, Santos, SP, Brazil.
Carolina Brito MunhozDepartament of General Surgery, Guilherme Álvaro Hospital, UNILUS, Santos, SP, Brazil.
Iara do SacramentoDepartament of General Surgery, Guilherme Álvaro Hospital, UNILUS, Santos, SP, Brazil.
Mônica MazzuranaDepartament of General Surgery, Guilherme Álvaro Hospital, UNILUS, Santos, SP, Brazil.
Guines Antunes AlvarezDepartament of General Surgery, Guilherme Álvaro Hospital, UNILUS, Santos, SP, Brazil.
Centro Universitário Lusíada · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA introdução da técnica laparoscópica em 1985 foi um fator importante na colecistectomia por representar técnica menos invasiva, resultado estético melhor e menor risco cirúrgico comparado ao procedimento laparotômico.

aimTo compare laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy in the treatment of cholelithiasis.

methodsA systematic review of randomized clinical trials, which included studies from four databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Lilacs) was performed. The keywords used were "Cholecystectomy", "Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic" and "Laparotomy". The methodological quality of primary studies was assessed by the Grade system.

resultsTen randomized controlled trials were included, totaling 2043 patients, 1020 in Laparoscopy group and 1023 in Minilaparotomy group. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy dispensed shorter length of hospital stay (p<0.00001) and return to work activities (p<0.00001) compared to minilaparotomy, and the minilaparotomy shorter operative time (p<0.00001) compared to laparoscopy. Laparoscopy decrease the risk of postoperative pain (NNT=7) and infectious complications (NNT=50). There was no statistical difference between the two groups regarding conversion (p=0,06) and surgical reinterventions (p=0,27), gall bladder's perforation (p=0,98), incidence of common bile duct injury (p=1.00), surgical site infection (p=0,52) and paralytic ileus (p=0,22).

conclusionIn cholelithiasis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative pain and infectious complications, as well as shorter length of hospital stay and time to return to work activities compared to minilaparotomy cholecystectomy.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholelithiasisHumansLaparotomyRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25004295
PMCPMC4678672
OpenAlexW1986704439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.