Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25003601›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Functional motor recovery from motoneuron axotomy is compromised in mice with defective corticospinal projections.

Yuetong Ding, Yibo Qu, Jia Feng, Meizhi Wang, Qi Han, Kwok-Fai So, Wutian Wu, Libing Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Time-lapse changes ofNeural regeneration research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuetong DingGuangdong-Hongkong-Macau Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Medical Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Diseases, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Yibo QuGuangdong-Hongkong-Macau Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Medical Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Diseases, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Jia FengGuangdong-Hongkong-Macau Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Medical Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Diseases, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Meizhi WangGuangdong-Hongkong-Macau Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Medical Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Diseases, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Qi HanGuangdong-Hongkong-Macau Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Medical Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Diseases, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Kwok-Fai SoGuangdong-Hongkong-Macau Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Medical Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Diseases, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Anatomy LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, P.R. China.
Wutian WuGuangdong-Hongkong-Macau Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Medical Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Diseases, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Anatomy LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, P.R. China.
Libing ZhouGuangdong-Hongkong-Macau Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Medical Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Diseases, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
Jinan University · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · CNNantong University · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brachial plexus injury (BPI) and experimental spinal root avulsion result in loss of motor function in the affected segments. After root avulsion, significant motoneuron function is restored by re-implantation of the avulsed root. How much this functional recovery depends on corticospinal inputs is not known. Here, we studied that question using Celsr3|Emx1 mice, in which the corticospinal tract (CST) is genetically absent. In adult mice, we tore off right C5-C7 motor and sensory roots and re-implanted the right C6 roots. Behavioral studies showed impaired recovery of elbow flexion in Celsr3|Emx1 mice compared to controls. Five months after surgery, a reduced number of small axons, and higher G-ratio of inner to outer diameter of myelin sheaths were observed in mutant versus control mice. At early stages post-surgery, mutant mice displayed lower expression of GAP-43 in spinal cord and of myelin basic protein (MBP) in peripheral nerves than control animals. After five months, mutant animals had atrophy of the right biceps brachii, with less newly formed neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) and reduced peak-to-peak amplitudes in electromyogram (EMG), than controls. However, quite unexpectedly, a higher motoneuron survival rate was found in mutant than in control mice. Thus, following root avulsion/re-implantation, the absence of the CST is probably an important reason to hamper axonal regeneration and remyelination, as well as target re-innervation and formation of new NMJ, resulting in lower functional recovery, while fostering motoneuron survival. These results indicate that manipulation of corticospinal transmission may help improve functional recovery following BPI.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAnimalsAxotomyBrachial PlexusFemaleGAP-43 ProteinMaleMice, TransgenicMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalNerve Fibers, MyelinatedNeuromuscular JunctionPyramidal TractsRecovery of FunctionGAP-43 Protein

Identifiers

PMID25003601
PMCPMC4087004
OpenAlexW1993245486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.