Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25003507›Full record

ArticleNano letters2014

Probing the mechanical properties of magnetosome chains in living magnetotactic bacteria.

André Körnig, Jiajia Dong, Mathieu Bennet, Marc Widdrat, Janet Andert, Frank D Müller, Dirk Schüler, Stefan Klumpp, Damien Faivre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Magnetic DNA Origami Nanorotors.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Micro-compression analysis of biopolymer-producing bacteria usingCell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Buckling of elastic filaments by discrete magnetic moments.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

André KörnigDepartment of Biomaterials and ‡Department of Theory and Bio-Systems, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces , Science Park Golm, 14424 Potsdam, Germany.
Jiajia Dong
Mathieu Bennet
Marc Widdrat
Janet Andert
Frank D Müller
Dirk Schüler
Stefan Klumpp
Damien Faivre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical properties of cytoskeletal networks are intimately involved in determining how forces and cellular processes are generated, directed, and transmitted in living cells. However, determining the mechanical properties of subcellular molecular complexes in vivo has proven to be difficult. Here, we combine in vivo measurements by optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy with theoretical modeling to decipher the mechanical properties of the magnetosome chain system encountered in magnetotactic bacteria. We exploit the magnetic properties of the endogenous intracellular nanoparticles to apply a force on the filament-connector pair involved in the backbone formation and stabilization. We show that the magnetosome chain can be broken by the application of external field strength higher than 30 mT and suggest that this originates from the rupture of the magnetosome connector MamJ. In addition, we calculate that the biological determinants can withstand in vivo a force of 25 pN. This quantitative understanding provides insights for the design of functional materials such as actuators and sensors using cellular components.

Indexed as

MagnetosomesMagnetospirillumX-Ray Diffraction

Identifiers

PMID25003507
PMCPMC4133184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.