ArticlePloS one2014
Tailored implementation of evidence-based practice for patients with chronic diseases.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Implementation of precision medicine in treating non-communicable diseases: a systematic review.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Applying system support mapping combined with the matrixed multiple case study approach to identify and analyse implementation determinants: lessons from a multi-site implementation study in German neonatal intensive care units.BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- Impact of Training and Municipal Support on Primary Health Care-Based Measurement of Alcohol Consumption in Three Latin American Countries: 5-Month Outcome Results of the Quasi-experimental Randomized SCALA Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Trial
- Improving the delivery of team-based survivorship care after primary breast cancer treatment through a multi-level intervention: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Trial
- Process evaluation of a tailored intervention programme of cardiovascular risk management in general practices.Implementation science : IS · 2016Trial
- Process evaluation of five tailored programs to improve the implementation of evidence-based recommendations for chronic conditions in primary care.Implementation science : IS · 2016Trial
- Tailored implementation of cardiovascular risk management in general practice: a cluster randomized trial.Implementation science : IS · 2016Trial
- Cluster randomised trial of a tailored intervention to improve the management of overweight and obesity in primary care in England.Implementation science : IS · 2016Trial
- A tailored intervention to implement guideline recommendations for elderly patients with depression in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised trial.Implementation science : IS · 2016Trial
- Healthcare professionals' views on healthcare-related factors influencing symptom course in persistent somatic symptoms: a qualitative study of four European countries.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Making sense of the outcome of a rehabilitation implementation trial in the intensive care unit: Mixed methods.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2025Article
- Primary care clinician perspectives on automated nephrology e-consults for diabetic kidney disease: a pre-implementation qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Cognitive screening and rehabilitation after cardiac arrest: only a few hurdles to take.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024Article
- Developing tailored intervention strategies for implementation of stratified care to low back pain with physiotherapists in Nigeria: a Delphi study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Understanding tailoring to support the implementation of evidence-based interventions in healthcare: The CUSTOMISE research programme protocol.HRB open research · 2023Article
- Characterising processes and outcomes of tailoring implementation strategies in healthcare: a protocol for a scoping review.HRB open research · 2022Article
- Conceptual tensions and practical trade-offs in tailoring implementation interventions.Frontiers in health services · 2022Article
- What and how do different stakeholders contribute to intervention development? A mixed methods study.HRB open research · 2022Article
- Understanding the Relationship between Depression and Chronic Diseases Such as Diabetes and Hypertension: A Grounded Theory Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhen designing interventions and policies to implement evidence based healthcare, tailoring strategies to the targeted individuals and organizations has been recommended. We aimed to gather insights into the ideas of a variety of people for implementing evidence-based practice for patients with chronic diseases, which were generated in five European countries.
methodsA qualitative study in five countries (Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, United Kingdom) was done, involving overall 115 individuals. A purposeful sample of four categories of stakeholders (healthcare professionals, quality improvement officers, healthcare purchasers and authorities, and health researchers) was involved in group interviews in each of the countries to generate items for improving healthcare in different chronic conditions per country: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, depression in elderly people, multi-morbidity, obesity. A disease-specific standardized list of determinants of practice in these conditions provided the starting point for these groups. The content of the suggested items was categorized in a pre-defined framework of 7 domains and specific themes in the items were identified within each domain.
resultsThe 115 individuals involved in the study generated 812 items, of which 586 addressed determinants of practice. These largely mapped onto three domains: individual health professional factors, patient factors, and professional interactions. Few items addressed guideline factors, incentives and resources, capacity of organizational change, or social, political and legal factors. The relative numbers of items in the different domains were largely similar across stakeholder categories within each of the countries. The analysis identified 29 specific themes in the suggested items across countries.
conclusionThe type of suggestions for improving healthcare practice was largely similar across different stakeholder groups, mainly addressing healthcare professionals, patient factors and professional interactions. As this study is one of the first of its kind, it is important that more research is done on tailored implementation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.