Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25002989›Full record

ArticleRare diseases (Austin, Tex.)2013

Unfolded protein response, treatment and CMT1B.

Yunhong Bai, Agnes Patzko, Michael E Shy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rare diseases (Austin, Tex.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Mechanisms and Treatments in Demyelinating CMT.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  3. Emerging Therapies for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Inherited Neuropathies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Charcot-Marie-Tooth: From Molecules to Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Challenges in modelling the Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathies for therapy development.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2019
    Review
  8. Recent advances in the genetic neuropathies.Current opinion in neurology · 2016
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yunhong BaiDepartment of Neurology; Carver College of Medicine; University of Iowa; Iowa City, IA USA.
Agnes PatzkoDepartment of Neurology; Carver College of Medicine; University of Iowa; Iowa City, IA USA.
Michael E ShyDepartment of Neurology; Carver College of Medicine; University of Iowa; Iowa City, IA USA.
Carver Bible College · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CMT1B is the second most frequent autosomal dominant inherited neuropathy and is caused by assorted mutations of the myelin protein zero (MPZ) gene. MPZ mutations cause neuropathy gain of function mechanisms that are largely independent MPZs normal role of mediating myelin compaction. Whether there are only a few or multiple pathogenic mechanisms that cause CMT1B is unknown. Arg98Cys and Ser63Del MPZ are two CMT1B causing mutations that have been shown to cause neuropathy in mice at least in part by activating the unfolded protein response (UPR). We have recently treated Arg98Cys mice with derivatives of curcumin that improved the neuropathy and reduced UPR activation.(1) Future studies will address whether manipulating the UPR will be a common or rare strategy for treating CMT1B or other forms of inherited neuropathies.

Indexed as

Charcot Marie Tooth disease 1B (CMT1B)curcumingeneticsmyelinperipheral nerveUnfolded Protein Response (UPR)

Identifiers

PMID25002989
PMCPMC3915562
OpenAlexW2312495227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.