Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25002720›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2014

Association of age with survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis from the ARCAD Clinical Trials Program.

Christopher H Lieu, Lindsay A Renfro, Aimery de Gramont, Jeffrey P Meyers, Timothy S Maughan, Matthew T Seymour, Leonard Saltz, Richard M Goldberg, Daniel J Sargent, S Gail Eckhardt and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Development and Validation of anJCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Mutational and co-mutational landscape of early onset colorectal cancer.Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christopher H Lieu
Lindsay A Renfro
Aimery de Gramont
Jeffrey P Meyers
Timothy S Maughan
Matthew T Seymour
Leonard Saltz
Richard M Goldberg
Daniel J Sargent
S Gail Eckhardt
Cathy Eng
Aide et Recherche en Cancérologie Digestive Foundation

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
OSU as Network Lead Academic Participating Site for the NCI NCTNU10CA180850 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BLUM, KRISTIE A, CHAKRAVARTI, ARNAB · 2014 to 2018
$6.8M
Medical Research Council G0701770Medical Research Council MC_U122861325Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/3NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study addressed whether age is prognostic for overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 20,023 patients from 24 first-line clinical trials in the ARCAD (Aide et Recherche en Cancérologie Digestive) database were analyzed. Primary age effects and interactions with age,sex, performance status (PS), and metastatic site were modeled using Cox proportional hazards stratified by treatment arm within study.

resultsOf total patients, 3,051 (15%) were age < or =50 years. Age was prognostic for both OS (P < .001)and PFS (P < .001), with U-shaped risk (i.e., highest risk was evident in youngest and oldest patients). Relative to patients of middle age, the youngest patients experienced 19% (95% CI, 7% to 33%) increased risk of death and 22% (95% CI, 10% to 35%) increased risk of progression. The oldest patients experienced 42% (95% CI, 31% to 54%) increased risk of death and 15% (95% CI, 7% to 24%) increased risk of progression or death. This relationship was more pronounced in the first year of follow-up. Age remained marginally significant for OS (P = .08) when adjusted forPS, sex, and presence of liver, lung, or peritoneal metastases, and age was significant in an adjusted model for PFS (P = .005). The age effect did not differ by site of metastatic disease, year of enrollment, type of therapy received, or biomarker mutational status.

conclusionYounger and older age are associated with poorer OS and PFS among treated patients with mCRC. Younger and older patients may represent higher-risk populations, and additional studies are warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsClinical Trials as TopicColorectal NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRisk

Identifiers

PMID25002720
PMCPMC4809210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.