Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25002703›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

Phenotypic integration in style dimorphic daffodils (Narcissus, Amaryllidaceae) with different pollinators.

Rocío Pérez-Barrales, Violeta I Simón-Porcar, Rocío Santos-Gally, Juan Arroyo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of pollen tube growth ability inPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Integrated phenotypes: understanding trait covariation in plants and animals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
  15. Modularity and intra-floral integration in metameric organisms: plants are more than the sum of their parts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rocío Pérez-BarralesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, UK Departmento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, University of Seville, Seville 41080, Spain rocio.barrales@port.ac.uk.
Violeta I Simón-PorcarDepartmento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, University of Seville, Seville 41080, Spain.
Rocío Santos-GallyDepartmento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, University of Seville, Seville 41080, Spain.
Juan ArroyoDepartmento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, University of Seville, Seville 41080, Spain.
Universidad de Sevilla · ESUniversity of Portsmouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different pollinators can exert different selective pressures on floral traits, depending on how they fit with flowers, which should be reflected in the patterns of variation and covariation of traits. Surprisingly, empirical evidence in support of this view is scarce. Here, we have studied whether the variation observed in floral phenotypic integration and covariation of traits in Narcissus species is associated with different groups of pollinators. Phenotypic integration was studied in two style dimorphic species, both with dimorphic populations mostly visited by long-tongued pollinators (close fit with flowers), and monomorphic populations visited by short-tongued insects (loose fit). For N. papyraceus, the patterns of variation and correlation among traits involved in different functions (attraction and fit with pollinators, transfer of pollen) were compared within and between population types. The genetic diversity of populations was also studied to control for possible effects on phenotypic variation. In both species, populations with long-tongued pollinators displayed greater phenotypic integration than those with short-tongued pollinators. Also, the correlations among traits involved in the same function were stronger than across functions. Furthermore, traits involved in the transfer of pollen were consistently more correlated and less variable than traits involved in the attraction of insects, and these differences were larger in dimorphic than monomorphic populations. In addition, population genetic parameters did not correlate with phenotypic integration or variation. Altogether, our results support current views of the role of pollinators in the evolution of floral integration.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPhenotypeSelection, GeneticAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsFlowersInsectaNarcissusPollinationSpecies Specificityadaptationgenetic diversityphenotypic selectionplasticitypollinator-mediated selectionstyle dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID25002703
PMCPMC4084543
OpenAlexW2006643375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.