Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25002700›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

Genetic constraints predict evolutionary divergence in Dalechampia blossoms.

Geir H Bolstad, Thomas F Hansen, Christophe Pélabon, Mohsen Falahati-Anbaran, Rocío Pérez-Barrales, W Scott Armbruster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Persistent selection on size explains micro- and macroevolutionary alignments in fly wings.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Evolution of gene order in prokaryotes is driven primarily by gene gain and loss.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Developmental bias predicts 60 million years of wing shape evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Evolvability and trait function predict phenotypic divergence of plant populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Geir H BolstadCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway geir.h.bolstad@ntnu.no.
Thomas F HansenDepartment of Biology, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway.
Christophe PélabonCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Mohsen Falahati-AnbaranDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway School of Biology and Center of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, University of Tehran, 14155-6455 Tehran, Iran.
Rocío Pérez-BarralesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, UK.
W Scott ArmbrusterDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway School of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, UK Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks AK 99775, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If genetic constraints are important, then rates and direction of evolution should be related to trait evolvability. Here we use recently developed measures of evolvability to test the genetic constraint hypothesis with quantitative genetic data on floral morphology from the Neotropical vine Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae). These measures were compared against rates of evolution and patterns of divergence among 24 populations in two species in the D. scandens species complex. We found clear evidence for genetic constraints, particularly among traits that were tightly phenotypically integrated. This relationship between evolvability and evolutionary divergence is puzzling, because the estimated evolvabilities seem too large to constitute real constraints. We suggest that this paradox can be explained by a combination of weak stabilizing selection around moving adaptive optima and small realized evolvabilities relative to the observed additive genetic variance.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, BiologicalPhenotypeAdaptation, BiologicalBayes TheoremComputer SimulationEuphorbiaceaeFlowersGenetics, PopulationMexicoPhylogenySelection, GeneticSpecies SpecificitySystems Biologyevolutionary rateG-matrixintegrationmacroevolutionmicroevolutionpower relationship

Identifiers

PMID25002700
PMCPMC4084540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.