Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25002699›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

The macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic integration: from development to deep time.

A Goswami, J B Smaers, C Soligo, P D Polly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cranial modularity drives phenotypic diversification and adaptive radiation of Antarctic icefishes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mosaic evolution underlies feliform morphological disparity.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A GoswamiResearch Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK a.goswami@ucl.ac.uk.
J B SmaersResearch Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK Department of Anthropology, University College London, 14 Taviton Street, London WC1H 0BW, UK Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Circle Road, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
C SoligoDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, 14 Taviton Street, London WC1H 0BW, UK.
P D PollyDepartment of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, 1001 East 10th Street, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic integration is a pervasive characteristic of organisms. Numerous analyses have demonstrated that patterns of phenotypic integration are conserved across large clades, but that significant variation also exists. For example, heterochronic shifts related to different mammalian reproductive strategies are reflected in postcranial skeletal integration and in coordination of bone ossification. Phenotypic integration and modularity have been hypothesized to shape morphological evolution, and we extended simulations to confirm that trait integration can influence both the trajectory and magnitude of response to selection. We further demonstrate that phenotypic integration can produce both more and less disparate organisms than would be expected under random walk models by repartitioning variance in preferred directions. This effect can also be expected to favour homoplasy and convergent evolution. New empirical analyses of the carnivoran cranium show that rates of evolution, in contrast, are not strongly influenced by phenotypic integration and show little relationship to morphological disparity, suggesting that phenotypic integration may shape the direction of evolutionary change, but not necessarily the speed of it. Nonetheless, phenotypic integration is problematic for morphological clocks and should be incorporated more widely into models that seek to accurately reconstruct both trait and organismal evolution.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBiological EvolutionDevelopmental BiologyPhenotypeSelection, GeneticSystems BiologyAnimalsBody PatterningModels, BiologicalPhylogenyTime FactorsVertebratesdisparityevolutionary ratesMammaliamodularityontogeny

Identifiers

PMID25002699
PMCPMC4084539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.