Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25002512›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Modulation of frustration in folding by sequence permutation.

R Paul Nobrega, Karunesh Arora, Sagar V Kathuria, Rita Graceffa, Raul A Barrea, Liang Guo, Srinivas Chakravarthy, Osman Bilsel, Thomas C Irving, Charles L Brooks and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frustration, function and folding.Current opinion in structural biology · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Sequence-, structure-, and dynamics-based comparisons of structurally homologous CheY-like proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

R Paul NobregaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605;
Karunesh AroraDepartment of Chemistry and Biophysics Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109;
Sagar V KathuriaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605;
Rita GraceffaInstitute for X-ray Physics, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany; and.
Raul A BarreaBiophysics Collaborative Access Team, Center for Synchrotron Radiation Research and Instrumentation and Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616.
Liang GuoBiophysics Collaborative Access Team, Center for Synchrotron Radiation Research and Instrumentation and Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616.
Srinivas ChakravarthyBiophysics Collaborative Access Team, Center for Synchrotron Radiation Research and Instrumentation and Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616.
Osman BilselDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605;
Thomas C IrvingBiophysics Collaborative Access Team, Center for Synchrotron Radiation Research and Instrumentation and Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616.
Charles L BrooksDepartment of Chemistry and Biophysics Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; brookscl@umich.edu c.robert.matthews@umassmed.edu.
C Robert MatthewsDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605; brookscl@umich.edu c.robert.matthews@umassmed.edu.
Illinois Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

X-RAY STUDIES OF NEUROFIBRILLARY TANGLES IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE BRAIN TISSUEP41RR008630 · NCRR · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI VOLZ, KARL W · 2001 to 2011
$14.4M
Time resolved SAXS studies on the RP2/Arl3 complex pp.484-485P41GM103622 · NIGMS · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI IRVING, THOMAS C · 2012 to 2020
$11.9M
WEB BASED DOCUMENTATION &TUTORIALS FOR YAMMPP41RR012255 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JOHNSON, JOHN EMIL · 1997 to 2009
$10.4M
NCRR NIH HHS 2P41RR008630-17NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR008630NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR012255NCRR NIH HHS RR012255NIGMS NIH HHS 9 P41 GM103622NIGMS NIH HHS 9 P41 GM103622-17NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Folding of globular proteins can be envisioned as the contraction of a random coil unfolded state toward the native state on an energy surface rough with local minima trapping frustrated species. These substructures impede productive folding and can serve as nucleation sites for aggregation reactions. However, little is known about the relationship between frustration and its underlying sequence determinants. Chemotaxis response regulator Y (CheY), a 129-amino acid bacterial protein, has been shown previously to populate an off-pathway kinetic trap in the microsecond time range. The frustration has been ascribed to premature docking of the N- and C-terminal subdomains or, alternatively, to the formation of an unproductive local-in-sequence cluster of branched aliphatic side chains, isoleucine, leucine, and valine (ILV). The roles of the subdomains and ILV clusters in frustration were tested by altering the sequence connectivity using circular permutations. Surprisingly, the stability and buried surface area of the intermediate could be increased or decreased depending on the location of the termini. Comparison with the results of small-angle X-ray-scattering experiments and simulations points to the accelerated formation of a more compact, on-pathway species for the more stable intermediate. The effect of chain connectivity in modulating the structures and stabilities of the early kinetic traps in CheY is better understood in terms of the ILV cluster model. However, the subdomain model captures the requirement for an intact N-terminal domain to access the native conformation. Chain entropy and aliphatic-rich sequences play crucial roles in biasing the early events leading to frustration in the folding of CheY.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingSequence Analysis, ProteinAmino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsComputer SimulationKineticsMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsModels, MolecularProtein StabilityProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryScattering, Small AngleThermodynamicsX-Ray DiffractionBacterial ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsCF-SAXSCheY permutantsGō modelsprotein-folding intermediates

Identifiers

PMID25002512
PMCPMC4115504
OpenAlexW2168762972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.