SynthesisClinical orthopaedics and related research2015
Outcomes of Lumbar Discectomy in Elite Athletes: The Need for High-level Evidence.
Synthesis in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Under Local Anesthesia for Small-Sized Lumbar Disc Herniation in Elite Athletes.International journal of spine surgery · 2026Article
- Surgical Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation in Elite Athletes: A Comparative Study of Microdiscectomy and Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Diskectomy in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Return to sports following discectomy: does a consensus exist?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
- Impact of Lumbar Disk Herniation on Performance Outcomes and New Contracts in the National Football League.Clinical spine surgery · 2023Article
- Spinal Injuries in the Overhead Athlete.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022Review
- "Fantasy Points" associated with Professional Athlete Performance after Lumbar Discectomy or Microdiscectomy.Spartan medical research journal · 2022Article
- Article
- Lumbar Spine Injuries in Sports: Review of the Literature and Current Treatment Recommendations.Sports medicine - open · 2019Review
- Intervertebral disc herniation in elite athletes.International orthopaedics · 2019Review
- Top orthopedic sports medicine procedures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2018Review
- Spine surgery in athletes with low back pain-considerations for management and treatment.Asian journal of sports medicine · 2014Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough lumbar discectomy for treatment of lumbar disc herniation in the general population generally improves patients' pain, function, and validated outcomes scores, results of treatment in elite athletes may differ because of the unique performance demands required of competitive athletes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed a systematic review to answer the following questions: (1) What proportion of athletes return to play after lumbar discectomy, and what is the effect of sport? (2) What is the expected recovery time after lumbar discectomy in elite athletes? (3) What is the expected career length and performance of elite athletes after lumbar discectomy?
methodsWe performed a systematic literature review of articles of lumbar discectomy in the elite athlete population through the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 1947 to 2013. Elite athletes were defined as professional, Olympic, or National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I collegiate level. A hand search of the references of all key articles was performed to ensure inclusion of all relevant studies. Information regarding study design, types of athletes, level of sport, recovery time, return to sport, length of career after surgery, and career performance after surgery was extracted. Ten articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this review. These articles consisted of levels III and IV data and were graded based on the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) scale.
resultsOverall, the studies included in this review found that 75% to 100% of athletes were able to return to elite competition after operative treatment. In general, a higher proportion of baseball players returned to elite competition compared with other athletes. The reported recovery period after lumbar discectomy ranged from 2.8 to 8.7 months. The average career length after lumbar discectomy ranged from 2.6 to 4.8 years. Elite athletes reached an average of 64.4% to 103.6% of baseline preoperative statistics after lumbar discectomy with variable performance based on sport.
conclusionsA high proportion of elite athletes undergoing lumbar discectomy return to play with variable performance scores on return. Future prospective studies are needed to compare the recovery time, career longevity, and performance for athletes undergoing lumbar discectomy versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.