"Getting engaged".

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Return of Research Results to Participants in Longitudinal Cohort Studies in Health Research: Findings From 24 Cohorts of the Amsterdam Cohort Hub.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
   Article
2. Community Advisors' Effect on a Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial for Asthma Treatment: Retrospective Analysis.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025
   Article
3. Substance use as subtext to health narratives: Identifying opportunities for improving care from community member perspectives.Patient education and counseling · 2024
   Article
4. Key issues for stakeholder engagement in the development of health and healthcare guidelines.Research involvement and engagement · 2023
   Article
5. The ACTIV-6 Stakeholder Advisory Committee: a model for virtual engagement in decentralized clinical trials.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023
   Article
6. PCORnet® 2020: current state, accomplishments, and future directions.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2021
   Article
7. A patient-centered perspective on the future of tic disorder diagnosis: response to "Tic disorders revisited: introduction to the term 'tic spectrum disorders" by Müller-Vahl et al.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2020
   Article
8. Patient engagement and study design of PROP UP: A multi-site patient-centered prospective observational study of patients undergoing hepatitis C treatment.Contemporary clinical trials · 2017
   Observational
9. Advancing engagement methods for trials: the CORE study relational model of engagement for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of experience-based co-design for people living with severe mental illnesses.Trials · 2017
   Review
10. Harms, benefits, and the nature of interventions in pragmatic clinical trials.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2015
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research.2014

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as