ReviewDer Anaesthesist2014
[Use of biomarkers in sepsis. Update and perspectives].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bacterial sepsis : Diagnostics and calculated antibiotic therapy.Der Anaesthesist · 2019Review
- [Bacterial sepsis : Diagnostics and calculated antibiotic therapy].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Review
- [Impairment of oxygenation of patients in surgical intensive care : Early symptom of severe sepsis].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Article
- Are there new approaches for diagnosis, therapy guidance and outcome prediction of sepsis?World journal of experimental medicine · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis and related complications are a challenge for intensive care medicine. Despite many advances in antibiotic therapy sepsis remains one of the most common diseases of patients in intensive care units and is designated as the main cause of death in critically ill patients. Persisting sepsis leads to impaired immunity, resulting in immunosuppression. Unspecific predictive signs complicate an early diagnosis; however, an early initiation of adequate therapy is of crucial importance for the prognosis. Scoring systems can be applied for the initial evaluation but are controversially discussed concerning the monitoring of disease progression and therapy as well as outcome prediction. Biomarkers are considered as a complementary approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.