Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25001602›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2014

rBCG30-induced immunity and cross-protection against Mycobacterium leprae challenge are enhanced by boosting with the Mycobacterium tuberculosis 30-kilodalton antigen 85B.

Thomas P Gillis, Michael V Tullius, Marcus A Horwitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Novel Targets for the Development of Tuberculosis Vaccine.Current drug discovery technologies · 2025
    Review
  2. IFN-γ-Driven macrophage responses in the immunity toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas P GillisLaboratory Research Branch, National Hansen's Disease Programs, LSU School of Veterinary Medicine, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Michael V TulliusDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Marcus A HorwitzDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA mhorwitz@mednet.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · USNational Hansen's Disease Program · US

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
Virology CoreP30AI028697 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KITCHEN, SCOTT G · 1991 to 2018
$39.9M
IMMUNOPROTECTIVE DETERMINANTS OF M TUBERCULOSIS IN AIDSR01AI031338 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HORWITZ, MARCUS AARON · 1991 to 2010
$6.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042NIAID NIH HHS 5P30 AI028697NIAID NIH HHS AI031338NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI028697NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI031338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leprosy remains a major global health problem and typically occurs in regions in which tuberculosis is endemic. Vaccines are needed that protect against both infections and do so better than the suboptimal Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine. Here, we evaluated rBCG30, a vaccine previously demonstrated to induce protection superior to that of BCG against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis challenge in animal models, for efficacy against Mycobacterium leprae challenge in a murine model of leprosy. rBCG30 overexpresses the M. tuberculosis 30-kDa major secretory protein antigen 85B, which is 85% homologous with the M. leprae homolog (r30ML). Mice were sham immunized or immunized intradermally with BCG or rBCG30 and challenged 2.5 months later by injection of viable M. leprae into each hind footpad. After 7 months, vaccine efficacy was assessed by enumerating the M. leprae bacteria per footpad. Both BCG and rBCG30 induced significant protection against M. leprae challenge. In the one experiment in which a comparison between BCG and rBCG30 was feasible, rBCG30 induced significantly greater protection than did BCG. Immunization of mice with purified M. tuberculosis or M. leprae antigen 85B also induced protection against M. leprae challenge but less so than BCG or rBCG30. Notably, boosting rBCG30 with M. tuberculosis antigen 85B significantly enhanced r30ML-specific immune responses, substantially more so than boosting BCG, and significantly augmented protection against M. leprae challenge. Thus, rBCG30, a vaccine that induces improved protection against M. tuberculosis, induces cross-protection against M. leprae that is comparable or potentially superior to that induced by BCG, and boosting rBCG30 with antigen 85B further enhances immune responses and protective efficacy.

Indexed as

AcyltransferasesAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBCG VaccineCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCross ProtectionFemaleImmunizationLeprosyMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMycobacterium bovisMycobacterium lepraeMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisAcyltransferasesantigen 85B, Mycobacterium tuberculosisAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBCG VaccineTuberculosis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25001602
PMCPMC4187824
OpenAlexW2040016228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.