ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2014
In vivo bacteriophage peptide display to tailor pharmacokinetics of biological nanoparticles.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a CD163-Targeted PET Radiotracer That Images Resident Macrophages in Atherosclerosis.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Review
- Protein Engineering: Advances in Phage Display for Basic Science and Medical Research.Biochemistry. Biokhimiia · 2022Review
- [Screening and Identification of the Peptides Specifically Binding to Human Non-small Cell Lung Cancer NCI-H1299 Cells].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2020Article
- Characterization of In Vivo Selected Bacteriophage for the Development of Novel Tumor-Targeting Agents with Specific Pharmacokinetics and Imaging Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017Article
- Design of virus-based nanomaterials for medicine, biotechnology, and energy.Chemical Society reviews · 2016Review
- Radiation-Guided Peptide Delivery in a Mouse Model of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.BioMed research international · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeClinical use of most radiolabeled targeting agents has been limited because of the uptake and retention in kidney and/or liver. We hypothesized that bacteriophage (phage) display could be exploited to select for peptide sequences with fast clearance and low kidney uptake with the added ability to redirect phage clearance away from the reticuloendothelial system towards the kidney possessing rapid kidney clearance. PROCEDURES: In vivo phage display was performed to identify peptides displayed on phage that were excreted rapidly into the urine of mice. A novel in vitro assay using kidney cells, developed to predict in vivo kidney retention, and in vivo pharmacokinetic analyses were performed to characterize selected peptides/phage clones.
resultsForty-three renal clearance clones (RCC) were identified. In vivo mixing experiments and in vitro kidney cell assays identified RCC1-02 as the lead compound. In vivo analysis of fluorescently labeled phage clones demonstrated the ability of RCC1-02 peptide to redirect the biodistribution of the large phage particle towards excretion via the kidney. Pharmacokinetic analysis of [(111)In]-radiolabeled peptides revealed that kidney retention of the control ErBB-2-avid peptide, [(111)In]DOTA-KCCYSL, at 2-h postinjection was 5.7 ± 0.7 %ID/g. In comparison, [(111)In]DOTA-RCC1-02 had kidney retention values of 1.66 ± 0.43 %ID/g, respectively.
conclusionsIn vivo phage display can identify phage and corresponding peptides that rapidly clear the renal system. In the future, these peptides may be used to impart favorable pharmacokinetics onto a wide range of radioimaging or therapeutic macromolecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.