ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2014
Thirteen Camellia chloroplast genome sequences determined by high-throughput sequencing: genome structure and phylogenetic relationships.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 243 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
243 citing papers in PubMed, 478 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative chloroplast genome analysis reveals genetic differentiation and maternal introgression in tea plants (Camellia sinensis) from Shaoyang, China.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genomes provides insights into phylogenetic relationships and screening of polymorphic markers in Dimocarpus and related species.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic and evolutionary insights into Oedogoniales from nine newly sequenced chloroplast genomes.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Integrative chloroplast genomics of Polygonaceae: evolutionary dynamics, codon optimization, and phylogenetic resolution.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Structural analysis of clingstone and freestone peach (Prunus persica L.) plastome genome: provides insight into phylogeny and time diversification.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Revisiting the phylogeny of Conioselinum (Apiaceae) by integrating nrDNA, plastomes and morphology evidence.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Comprehensive plastid phylogenomics reveal the phylogeny ofPhytoKeys · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Complete chloroplast genome characterization and phylogenetic analysis of two natural caffeine-freeFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Woody oil crop domestication in the genusiScience · 2025Review
- Chloroplast Genome Analysis of SixBiology · 2025Article
- Comparative and phylogenetic study on the chloroplast genomes of CMS with the cytoplasm of Aegilops ovata and its maintainer line in wheat.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Determination of the Phylogenetic Relationship ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Species concept of golden flower camellias in China.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
183 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCamellia is an economically and phylogenetically important genus in the family Theaceae. Owing to numerous hybridization and polyploidization, it is taxonomically and phylogenetically ranked as one of the most challengingly difficult taxa in plants. Sequence comparisons of chloroplast (cp) genomes are of great interest to provide a robust evidence for taxonomic studies, species identification and understanding mechanisms that underlie the evolution of the Camellia species.
resultsThe eight complete cp genomes and five draft cp genome sequences of Camellia species were determined using Illumina sequencing technology via a combined strategy of de novo and reference-guided assembly. The Camellia cp genomes exhibited typical circular structure that was rather conserved in genomic structure and the synteny of gene order. Differences of repeat sequences, simple sequence repeats, indels and substitutions were further examined among five complete cp genomes, representing a wide phylogenetic diversity in the genus. A total of fifteen molecular markers were identified with more than 1.5% sequence divergence that may be useful for further phylogenetic analysis and species identification of Camellia. Our results showed that, rather than functional constrains, it is the regional constraints that strongly affect sequence evolution of the cp genomes. In a substantial improvement over prior studies, evolutionary relationships of the section Thea were determined on basis of phylogenomic analyses of cp genome sequences.
conclusionsDespite a high degree of conservation between the Camellia cp genomes, sequence variation among species could still be detected, representing a wide phylogenetic diversity in the genus. Furthermore, phylogenomic analysis was conducted using 18 complete cp genomes and 5 draft cp genome sequences of Camellia species. Our results support Chang's taxonomical treatment that C. pubicosta may be classified into sect. Thea, and indicate that taxonomical value of the number of ovaries should be reconsidered when classifying the Camellia species. The availability of these cp genomes provides valuable genetic information for accurately identifying species, clarifying taxonomy and reconstructing the phylogeny of the genus Camellia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.