CT characteristics, risk stratification, and prediction models in traumatic brain injury.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The Effect of Cerebrolysin on the Predictive Value of Baseline Prognostic Risk Score in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of medicine and life
   Trial
2. Functional Status Scale in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2016
   Observational

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Use of Rotterdam CT scores for mortality risk stratification in children with traumatic brain injury.2014

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as