Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25000373›Full record

ArticleClinical linguistics & phonetics

How to meet the neighbors: Modality effects on phonological generalization.

Judith A Gierut, Michele L Morrisette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical linguistics & phonetics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Nexus to Lexis: Phonological Disorders in Children.Seminars in speech and language · 2016
    Article
  3. Effect Size for Single-Subject Design in Phonological Treatment.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Judith A GierutDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University , Bloomington, IN , USA.
Michele L Morrisette
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

DEVELOPMENT OF PHONOLOGICAL CATEGORIESR01DC001694 · NIDCD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI GIERUT, JUDITH A · 1992 to 2013
$5.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001694NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC001694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term auditory priming of words from dense neighborhoods has been posited as a learning mechanism that affects change in the phonological structure of children's lexical representations. An apparent confound associated with the modality of priming responsible for structural change has been introduced in the literature, which challenges this proposal. Thus, our purpose was to evaluate prime modality in the treatment of children with phonological delay. Nine children were assigned to auditory-visual, auditory, or visual priming of words from dense neighborhoods prior to the treatment of production as the independent variable. The dependent variable was phonological generalization. Results showed that auditory priming (with or without visual input) promoted greater generalization on an order of magnitude of 3:1. Findings support the theoretical significance of auditory priming for phonological learning and demonstrate the applied utility of priming in clinical treatment.

Indexed as

Generalization, PsychologicalPhoneticsRepetition PrimingVerbal LearningArticulation DisordersChild, PreschoolCuesFemaleHumansLanguage Development DisordersMaleSpeech Production MeasurementSpeech TherapyVocabularylexical neighborhoodsphonological delaypriming

Identifiers

PMID25000373
PMCPMC4676943
OpenAlexW2047871091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.