ReviewAnnals of occupational and environmental medicine2014
An Evidence-Based Multidisciplinary Practice Guideline to Reduce the Workload due to Lifting for Preventing Work-Related Low Back Pain.
Review in Annals of occupational and environmental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Dutch Multidisciplinary Occupational Health Guideline to Enhance Work Participation Among Low Back Pain and Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome Patients.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2022Guideline
- Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.Human factors · 2016Pooled it
- Does the use of small aids during patient handling activities lead to a decreased occurrence of musculoskeletal complaints and diseases? A systematic review.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2016Pooled it
- Exploring lumbar and lower limb kinematics and kinetics for evidence that lifting technique is associated with LBP.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Effectiveness of a tailored implementation strategy to improve adherence to a guideline on mental health problems in occupational health care.BMC health services research · 2019Trial
- Assessing low-back loading during lifting using personalized electromyography-driven trunk models and NIOSH-based risk levels.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Analysis of poor work postures during morning care operations of intensive care unit nurses: a field research.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Tensions of Low-Back Pain and Lifting; Bridging Clinical Low-Back Pain and Occupational Lifting Guidelines.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Influence of caregiver understanding of their capability to perform activities of daily living, disease comprehension, and attitudes on occupational low back pain: a cross-sectional study.Journal of physical therapy science · 2024Article
- Validity and reliability of Japanese version of the MAPO index for assessing manual patient handling in nursing homes.Journal of occupational health · 2024Article
- Addressing Occupational Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Preventive and Therapeutic Strategies.Cureus · 2023Review
- Trunk Muscle Coactivation in People with and without Low Back Pain during Fatiguing Frequency-Dependent Lifting Activities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Centre of pressure parameters for the assessment of biomechanical risk in fatiguing frequency-dependent lifting activities.PloS one · 2022Article
- Manual handling of heavy loads and low back pain among different occupational groups: results of the 2018 BIBB/BAuA employment survey.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Healthcare Workers and Manual Patient Handling: A Pilot Study for Interdisciplinary Training.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Sex and gender considerations in low back pain clinical practice guidelines: a scoping review.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2020Article
- Whole body biomechanical burden of healthcare workers: proposal for a complementary risk assessment and management tool (HOARA).La Medicina del lavoro · 2019Article
- Cardiovascular and Psychophysical Response to Repetitive Lifting Tasks in Women.Journal of lifestyle medicine · 2019Article
- The new "Tehran Back Belt": Design then testing during a simulated sitting task improved biomechanical spine muscle activity.Health promotion perspectives · 2019Article
- Developing predictive models for return to work using the Military Power, Performance and Prevention (MP3) musculoskeletal injury risk algorithm: a study protocol for an injury risk assessment programme.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We developed an evidence-based practice guideline to support occupational safety and health (OSH) professionals in assessing the risk due to lifting and in selecting effective preventive measures for low back pain (LBP) in the Netherlands. The guideline was developed at the request of the Dutch government by a project team of experts and OSH professionals in lifting and work-related LBP. The recommendations for risk assessment were based on the quality of instruments to assess the risk on LBP due to lifting. Recommendations for interventions were based on a systematic review of the effects of worker- and work directed interventions to reduce back load due to lifting. The quality of the evidence was rated as strong (A), moderate (B), limited (C) or based on consensus (D). Finally, eight experts and twenty-four OSH professionals commented on and evaluated the content and the feasibility of the preliminary guideline. For risk assessment we recommend loads heavier than 25 kg always to be considered a risk for LBP while loads less than 3 kg do not pose a risk. For loads between 3-25 kg, risk assessment shall be performed using the Manual handling Assessment Charts (MAC)-Tool or National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) lifting equation. Effective work oriented interventions are patient lifting devices (Level A) and lifting devices for goods (Level C), optimizing working height (Level A) and reducing load mass (Level C). Ineffective work oriented preventive measures are regulations to ban lifting without proper alternatives (Level D). We do not recommend worker-oriented interventions but consider personal lift assist devices as promising (Level C). Ineffective worker-oriented preventive measures are training in lifting technique (Level A), use of back-belts (Level A) and pre-employment medical examinations (Level A). This multidisciplinary evidence-based practice guideline gives clear criteria whether an employee is at risk for LBP while lifting and provides an easy-reference for (in)effective risk reduction measures based on scientific evidence, experience, and consensus among OSH experts and practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.