ReviewFrontiers in systems neuroscience2014
Nanostructures: a platform for brain repair and augmentation.
Review in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Potential of Biomaterial-Based Approaches as Therapies for Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pre-clinical Studies.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Pooled it
- Advanced Nanomaterials Functionalized with Metal Complexes for Cancer Therapy: From Drug Loading to Targeted Cellular Response.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- "In the spectrum of people who are healthy": Views of individuals at risk of dementia on using neurotechnology for cognitive enhancement.Neuroethics · 2024Article
- Designing with Iontronic Logic Gates─From a Single Polyelectrolyte Diode to an Integrated Ionic Circuit.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
- Impact of Magnetite Nanowires on In Vitro Hippocampal Neural Networks.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Neuro-nanotechnology: diagnostic and therapeutic nano-based strategies in applied neuroscience.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Review
- Advanced theragnostics for the central nervous system (CNS) and neurological disorders using functional inorganic nanomaterials.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2023Review
- Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Inhibit TRPC4-Mediated Muscarinic Cation Current in Mouse Ileal Myocytes.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Mechanical Performance and Applications of CNTs Reinforced Polymer Composites-A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Nanomaterials Used in Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage: An Up-to-Date Overview.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Nanoscale Patterning of Carbon Nanotubes: Techniques, Applications, and Future.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020Review
- Mechanical and structural properties of major ampullate silk from spiders fed carbon nanomaterials.PloS one · 2020Article
- Carbon Nanomaterials for the Treatment of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Water and Environmental Remediation.Nanoscale research letters · 2019Review
- An Overview of the Recent Developments in Metal Matrix Nanocomposites Reinforced by Graphene.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Biofunctionalized 3D Nanopillar Arrays Fostering Cell Guidance and Promoting Synapse Stability and Neuronal Activity in Networks.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2018Article
- Advances in Nano Neuroscience: From Nanomaterials to Nanotools.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Review
- Vectorized nanodelivery systems for ischemic stroke: a concept and a need.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2017Review
- Value of Functionalized Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Temporal Lobe Epilepsy on MRI.Neural plasticity · 2016Article
- Trends and Challenges in Neuroengineering: Toward "Intelligent" Neuroprostheses through Brain-"Brain Inspired Systems" Communication.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Article
- Synthesis and applications of carbon nanomaterials for energy generation and storage.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoscale structures have been at the core of research efforts dealing with integration of nanotechnology into novel electronic devices for the last decade. Because the size of nanomaterials is of the same order of magnitude as biomolecules, these materials are valuable tools for nanoscale manipulation in a broad range of neurobiological systems. For instance, the unique electrical and optical properties of nanowires, nanotubes, and nanocables with vertical orientation, assembled in nanoscale arrays, have been used in many device applications such as sensors that hold the potential to augment brain functions. However, the challenge in creating nanowires/nanotubes or nanocables array-based sensors lies in making individual electrical connections fitting both the features of the brain and of the nanostructures. This review discusses two of the most important applications of nanostructures in neuroscience. First, the current approaches to create nanowires and nanocable structures are reviewed to critically evaluate their potential for developing unique nanostructure based sensors to improve recording and device performance to reduce noise and the detrimental effect of the interface on the tissue. Second, the implementation of nanomaterials in neurobiological and medical applications will be considered from the brain augmentation perspective. Novel applications for diagnosis and treatment of brain diseases such as multiple sclerosis, meningitis, stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, and autism will be considered. Because the blood brain barrier (BBB) has a defensive mechanism in preventing nanomaterials arrival to the brain, various strategies to help them to pass through the BBB will be discussed. Finally, the implementation of nanomaterials in neurobiological applications is addressed from the brain repair/augmentation perspective. These nanostructures at the interface between nanotechnology and neuroscience will play a pivotal role not only in addressing the multitude of brain disorders but also to repair or augment brain functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.