ArticleEuropean journal of histochemistry : EJH2014
An easy-to-handle microfluidic device suitable for immunohistochemical procedures in mammalian cells grown under flow conditions.
Article in European journal of histochemistry : EJH, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of shear stress and size on viability of endothelial cells exposed to gold nanoparticles.Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology · 2017Article
- Is there still room for novelty, in histochemical papers?European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2016Review
- Histochemistry in biology and medicine: a message from the citing journals.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2015Review
- Impact of Histochemistry on biomedical research: looking through the articles published in a long-established histochemical journal.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microfluidic, the technology that manipulates small amount of fluids in microscale complex devices, has undergone a remarkable development during the last decade, by targeting a significant range of applications, including biological tests and single-cell analysis, and by displaying many advantages such as reduced reagent consumption, decreased costs and faster analysis. Furthermore, the introduction of microfluidic tools has revolutionized the study of vascular functions, because the controlled three-dimensional environment and the continuous perfusion provided by the microdevice allow simulating the physiological characteristics of the circulatory system. Researchers interested in the study of vascular physiology, however, are often hampered by the difficulty in handling reduced number of cells after growth in these devices. This work shows how to apply different protocols commonly used in biology, such as the immunofluorescence technique, to cells grown in reversibly-bound microfluidic devices, obtaining results comparable to those retrieved under static conditions in multiwells. In this way, we are able to combine the advantages of microfluidic, i.e., application of continuous flow and shear stress, with classical protocols for the study of endothelial cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.