Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24998849›Full record

ArticleOncogene2015

Autophagy mediates HIF2α degradation and suppresses renal tumorigenesis.

X-D Liu, J Yao, D N Tripathi, Z Ding, Y Xu, M Sun, J Zhang, S Bai, P German, A Hoang and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

X-D LiuDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
J YaoDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
D N TripathiInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Z DingDepartment of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Y XuDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
M SunDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
J ZhangInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
S BaiDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
P GermanDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
A HoangDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
L ZhouDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
D JonaschInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
X ZhangDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
C J ContiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College Station, Houston, TX, USA.
E EfstathiouDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
N M TannirDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
N T EissaDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
G B MillsDepartment of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
C L WalkerInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
E JonaschDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Center for Protein Folding Machinery (RMI)PN2EY016525 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI CHIU, WAH · 2005 to 2015
$33.6M
TARGETED GENOMICS FACILITY COREP30ES023512 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI DEUTZ, NICOLAAS E · 2014 to 2017
$3.3M
Tumor Suppressor Localization and Function at the PeroxisomeR01CA143811 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WALKER, CHERYL L. · 2010 to 2018
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA143811NEI NIH HHS PN2 EY016525NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES023512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is a conserved process involved in lysosomal degradation of protein aggregates and damaged organelles. The role of autophagy in cancer is a topic of intense debate, and the underlying mechanism is still not clear. The hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF2α), an oncogenic transcription factor implicated in renal tumorigenesis, is known to be degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). Here, we report that HIF2α is in part constitutively degraded by autophagy. HIF2α interacts with autophagy-lysosome system components. Inhibition of autophagy increases HIF2α, whereas induction of autophagy decreases HIF2α. The E3 ligase von Hippel-Lindau and autophagy receptor protein p62 are required for autophagic degradation of HIF2α. There is a compensatory interaction between the UPS and autophagy in HIF2α degradation. Autophagy inactivation redirects HIF2α to proteasomal degradation, whereas proteasome inhibition induces autophagy and increases the HIF2α-p62 interaction. Importantly, clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is frequently associated with monoallelic loss and/or mutation of autophagy-related gene ATG7, and the low expression level of autophagy genes correlates with ccRCC progression. The protein levels of ATG7 and beclin 1 are also reduced in ccRCC tumors. This study indicates that autophagy has an anticancer role in ccRCC tumorigenesis, and suggests that constitutive autophagic degradation of HIF2α is a novel tumor suppression mechanism.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsAutophagyAutophagy-Related Protein 7Basic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBeclin-1Carcinoma, Renal CellCell Line, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticEndothelial PAS Domain-Containing Protein 1HEK293 CellsHumansKidneyKidney NeoplasmsMembrane ProteinsRNA InterferenceAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsATG7 protein, humanAutophagy-Related Protein 7Basic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBeclin-1BECN1 protein, humanEndothelial PAS Domain-Containing Protein 1Membrane ProteinsRNA, Small InterferingSequestosome-1 ProteinSQSTM1 protein, humanUbiquitin-Activating EnzymesVon Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Protein

Identifiers

PMID24998849
PMCPMC4286517
OpenAlexW1964280370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.