Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24998258›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

Impact on mortality of the timing of renal replacement therapy in patients with severe acute kidney injury in septic shock: the IDEAL-ICU study (initiation of dialysis early versus delayed in the intensive care unit): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Saber Davide Barbar, Christine Binquet, Mehran Monchi, Rémi Bruyère, Jean-Pierre Quenot

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01682590 (Impact on Mortality of the Timing of Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients With Severe Acute Kidney Injury in Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01682590 phase3terminatednot on this map

Impact on Mortality of the Timing of Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients With Severe Acute Kidney Injury in Septic Shock: the IDEAL-ICU Study (Initiation of Dialysis Early Versus Delayed in the Intensive Care Unit): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRan2012Enrolled500ConditionsSeptic Shock, Acute Renal Failure (as Defined by the "Failure" Stage of the RIFLE Classification)ArmsRenal Remplacement Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Timing of renal replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saber Davide BarbarService de Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Carémeau, Nîmes, France. saber.barbar@chu-nimes.fr.
Christine Binquet
Mehran Monchi
Rémi Bruyère
Jean-Pierre Quenot

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the most dreaded complications of septic shock is acute kidney injury. It occurs in around 50% of patients, with a mortality rate of about 60% at 3 months. There is no consensus on the optimal time to initiate renal replacement therapy. Retrospective and observational studies suggest that early implementation of renal replacement therapy could improve the prognosis for these patients. METHODS/

designThis protocol summarizes the rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial investigating the effect of early versus delayed renal replacement therapy in patients with severe acute kidney injury in early septic shock. In total, 864 critically ill adults with septic shock and evidence of acute kidney injury, defined as the failure stage of the RIFLE classification, will be enrolled. The primary outcome is mortality at 90 days. Secondary outcomes include safety, number of days free of mechanical ventilation, number of days free of renal replacement therapy, intensive care length of stay, in-hospital length of stay, quality of life as evaluated by the EQ-5D and renal replacement therapy dependence at hospital discharge. The primary analysis will be intention to treat. Recruitment started in March 2012 and will be completed by March 2015. DISCUSSION: This protocol for a randomized controlled study investigating the impact of the timing of renal replacement therapy initiation should provide an answer to a key question for the management of patients with acute kidney injury in the context of septic shock, for whom the mortality rate remains close to 60% despite improved understanding of physiopathology and recent therapeutic advances.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01682590, registered on 10 September 2012.

Indexed as

Research DesignTime-to-TreatmentAcute Kidney InjuryClinical ProtocolsFranceHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntention to Treat AnalysisKaplan-Meier EstimateLength of StayProportional Hazards ModelsQuality of LifeRenal Replacement TherapyRespiration, ArtificialRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID24998258
PMCPMC4226975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.