Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24998257›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2015

Rivastigmine but not vardenafil reverses cannabis-induced impairment of verbal memory in healthy humans.

E L Theunissen, P Heckman, E B de Sousa Fernandes Perna, K P C Kuypers, A Sambeth, A Blokland, J Prickaerts, S W Toennes, J G Ramaekers

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Sulfur-containing therapeutics in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A single dose of cocaine enhances prospective memory performance.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E L TheunissenDepartment of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, Netherlands, e.theunissen@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
P Heckman
E B de Sousa Fernandes Perna
K P C Kuypers
A Sambeth
A Blokland
J Prickaerts
S W Toennes
J G Ramaekers
Maastricht University · NLGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleOne of the most often reported cognitive deficits of acute cannabis administration is an impaired recall of previously learned information.

objectiveThe aim of the present study was to determine whether cannabis-induced memory impairment in humans is mediated via glutamatergic or cholinergic pathways.

methodsFifteen occasional cannabis users participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, six-way cross-over study. On separate test days, subjects received combinations of pretreatment (placebo, vardenafil 20 mg or rivastigmine 3 mg) and treatment (placebo or 1,376 mg cannabis/kg body weight). Cognitive tests were administered immediately after inhalation of treatment was finished and included measures of memory (visual verbal learning task, prospective memory test, Sternberg memory test), perceptual-motor control (critical tracking task), attention (divided attention task) and motor impulsivity (stop signal task).

resultsThe results of this study demonstrate that subjects under the influence of cannabis were impaired in all memory tasks, in critical tracking, divided attention and the stop signal task. Pretreatment with rivastigmine attenuated the effect of cannabis on delayed recall and showed a trend towards significance on immediate recall. When cannabis was given in combination with vardenafil, there were no significant interaction effects in any of the tasks.

conclusionsThe present data therefore suggest that acetylcholine plays an important role in cannabis-induced memory impairment, whereas similar results for glutamate have not been demonstrated in this study.

Indexed as

CannabisAcetylcholineAdultAttentionCannabinoidsCognitionCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlutamic AcidHumansImidazolesMaleMarijuana SmokingMemoryMemory DisordersAcetylcholineCannabinoidsGlutamic AcidImidazolesPhenylcarbamatesPiperazinesRivastigmineSulfonesTriazinesVardenafil Dihydrochloride

Identifiers

PMID24998257
OpenAlexW2087994261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.