Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24997762›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2014

Independent control of gamma and theta activity by distinct interneuron networks in the olfactory bulb.

Izumi Fukunaga, Jan T Herb, Mihaly Kollo, Edward S Boyden, Andreas T Schaefer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 222 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Optogenetics Neuromodulation of the Nose.Behavioural neurology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Izumi Fukunaga1] Behavioural Neurophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany. [2] Division of Neurophysiology, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, London, UK.
Jan T Herb1] Behavioural Neurophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany. [2] Division of Neurophysiology, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, London, UK. [3] Department Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mihaly Kollo1] Behavioural Neurophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany. [2] Division of Neurophysiology, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, London, UK.
Edward S BoydenMedia Lab, Synthetic Neurobiology Group, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Andreas T Schaefer1] Behavioural Neurophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg, Germany. [2] Division of Neurophysiology, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, London, UK. [3] Department Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. [4] Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.
Max Planck Institute for Medical Research · DEMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_1202/5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circuits in the brain possess the ability to orchestrate activities on different timescales, but the manner in which distinct circuits interact to sculpt diverse rhythms remains unresolved. The olfactory bulb is a classic example of a place in which slow theta and fast gamma rhythms coexist. Furthermore, inhibitory interneurons that are generally implicated in rhythm generation are segregated into distinct layers, neatly separating local and global motifs. We combined intracellular recordings in vivo with circuit-specific optogenetic interference to examine the contribution of inhibition to rhythmic activity in the mouse olfactory bulb. We found that the two inhibitory circuits controlled rhythms on distinct timescales: local, glomerular networks coordinated theta activity, regulating baseline and odor-evoked inhibition, whereas granule cells orchestrated gamma synchrony and spike timing. Notably, granule cells did not contribute to baseline rhythms or sniff-coupled odor-evoked inhibition. Thus, activities on theta and gamma timescales are controlled by separate, dissociable inhibitory networks in the olfactory bulb.

Indexed as

AnimalsEvoked PotentialsGamma RhythmInterneuronsMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNeural InhibitionOdorantsOlfactory BulbOptogeneticsPatch-Clamp TechniquesSmellTheta RhythmWakefulness

Identifiers

PMID24997762
PMCPMC4146518
OpenAlexW2041057250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.