Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24997173›Full record

ReviewCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2014

Extracorporeal photopheresis (photochemotherapy) in the treatment of acute and chronic graft versus host disease: immunological mechanisms and the results from clinical studies.

Øystein Bruserud, Tor Henrik Anderson Tvedt, Petter Quist Paulsen, Aymen Bushra Ahmed, Tobias Gedde-Dahl, Geir E Tjønnfjord, Heidi Slåstad, Dag Heldal, Håkon Reikvam

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Updates in chronic graft-versus-host disease.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Monocytes show immunoregulatory capacity on CD4Clinical and experimental immunology · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Deciphering the Mystery: Extracorporeal Photopheresis in Graft-versus-Host Disease.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2015
    Article
  17. Treatment of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Childhood with Extracorporeal Photochemotherapy/Photopheresis: The Padova Experience.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Øystein BruserudSection for Hematology, Institute of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, oystein.bruserud@haukeland.no.
Tor Henrik Anderson Tvedt
Petter Quist Paulsen
Aymen Bushra Ahmed
Tobias Gedde-Dahl
Geir E Tjønnfjord
Heidi Slåstad
Dag Heldal
Håkon Reikvam
Haukeland University Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an immunomodulatory alternative for treatment of graft versus host disease (GVHD). The blood is then separated into its various components through apheresis; buffy coat cells are thereafter treated with 8-methoxypsoralen before exposure to ultraviolet light and finally reinfused into the patient. There is a general agreement that this treatment has an anti-GVHD effect, but the mechanisms of action behind this effect are only partly understood. However, altered maturation of dendritic cells (DC) and thereby indirect modulation of T-cell reactivity seems to be one important mechanism together with DC-presentation of antigens derived from apoptotic donor T cells and induction of regulatory T cells. The treatment has been best studied in patients with chronic GVHD (both pediatric and adult patients), but most studies are not randomized and it is difficult to know whether the treatment is more effective than the alternatives. The clinical studies of ECP in adults with acute GVHD are few and not randomized; it is not possible to judge whether this treatment should be a preferred second- or third-line treatment. There is no evidence for increased risk of leukemia relapse or suppression of specific graft versus leukemia reactivity by this treatment, so specific antileukemic immunotherapy may still be possible. Thus, even though the treatment seems effective in patients with GVHD, further clinical (especially randomized) as well as biological studies with careful standardization of the treatment are needed before it is possible to conclude how ECP should be used in acute and chronic GVHD.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHumansPhotopheresisStem Cell TransplantationTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID24997173
PMCPMC11029168
OpenAlexW2034152630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.