Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24996916›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2014

Shorter or longer anticoagulation to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luciane Cruz Lopes, John Eikelboom, Frederick A Spencer, Elie A Akl, Clive Kearon, Ignacio Neumann, Sam Schulman, Neera Bhatnagar, Gordon Guyatt

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Luciane Cruz LopesPharmaceutical Sciences Post graduate Course, University of Sorocaba, UNISO, Sorocaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3684-3275
John EikelboomDivision of Hematology and Thromboembolism, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Frederick A SpencerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7165-5982
Elie A AklDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Clive KearonDivision of Hematology and Thromboembolism, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ignacio NeumannDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Sam SchulmanDivision of Hematology and Thromboembolism, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Neera BhatnagarHealth Sciences Library McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Gordon GuyattDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
McMaster University · CAPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversidade de Sorocaba · BRUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major disease associated with short-term and long-term morbidity and mortality. Patients with a VTE provoked by surgery or immobilisation are at low risk of recurrence and do not require long-term anticoagulation; those with a VTE and metastatic cancer are at high risk of recurrence and require lifetime thromboprophylaxis. In those at intermediate risk of recurrence, it remains controversial whether prolonging anticoagulation and thus incurring treatment burden and bleeding risk is warranted. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials enrolling patients with VTE at intermediate risk of recurrence and evaluating short-term anticoagulation (12 weeks to 9 months initial therapy) versus longer term anticoagulation (at least 6 months additional anticoagulation beyond the course of treatment in the shorter arm). Anticoagulation could consist of vitamin K antagonists or new oral anticoagulants. Outcomes of interest include recurrent non-fatal thrombosis (deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), major non-fatal bleeding and mortality. We will systematically search CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials. Teams of two reviewers will, independently and in duplicate, screen titles and abstracts and complete full text reviews to determine eligibility, and subsequently abstract data and assess risk of bias in eligible trials. We will conduct meta-analyses to establish the effect of short-term versus long-term anticoagulation on the outcomes of interest and evaluate confidence in estimates (quality of evidence) using the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation) approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our review will facilitate evidence-based management of patients with unprovoked or recurrent VTE. For purposes of privacy and confidentiality, the systematic review will be limited to studies with deidentified data. The study will be disseminated by peer-review publication and conference presentation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO (CRD42014007620).

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsHumansRecurrenceTime FactorsVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsVASCULAR MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID24996916
PMCPMC4091261
OpenAlexW2110259999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.