Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24996828›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2014

Incidence of febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant FEC-D treatment.

Hazem Assi, Joshua Murray, Laura Boyle, Daniel Rayson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Real-world use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in ambulatory breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Observational
  6. Febrile neutropenia in adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study in routine clinical practice from a single institution.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hazem AssiDivision of Medical Oncology, The Moncton Hospital, 135 MacBeath Ave., Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 6Z8, Canada, hazemassi@gmail.com.
Joshua Murray
Laura Boyle
Daniel Rayson
Dalhousie University · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAHorizon Health Network · CAMoncton Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) among women receiving FEC-D (flurouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for three cycles followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for three cycles) chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer (ESBC) and the impact of primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis in a non-clinical trial setting. PATIENTS AND

methodsA retrospective chart review of women referred for ESBC to The Moncton Hospital between 2005 and 2010 evaluated patient and disease characteristics, adjuvant chemotherapy receipt, G-CSF usage, FN incidence, hospital admission rates, and length of stay. Association of variables with FN was examined, and exploratory multivariable logistic regression modeling examined the impact of baseline variables on risk of FN.

resultsOf 520 patients enrolled in the database, 251 (48.3 %) received adjuvant chemotherapy for ESBC. Most (66.9 %) received FEC-D. Overall, 55 (21.9 %) patients developed FN. Forty-four (26.2 %) patients on FEC-D developed FN. Forty of 129 (31.0 %) FEC-D patients who did not receive primary G-CSF prophylaxis developed FN, versus 4 of 39 (10.3 %) receiving G-CSF. Receipt of FEC-D or TC (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for four or six cycles) was associated with odds ratios of 6.5 or 6.77, respectively, for the development of FN. Receipt of trastuzumab with chemotherapy was associated with an odds ratio of 3.48 for developing FN versus no trastuzumab. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis led to a 63 % reduction in the odds ratio of developing FN.

conclusionsIncidence of FN with FEC-D treatment is considerably higher in clinical practice than reported in phase III trials. Consistent with ASCO guidelines, prophylactic G-CSF should be considered for all ESBC patients receiving adjuvant FEC-D.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChemotherapy-Induced Febrile NeutropeniaAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCanadaChemopreventionChemotherapy, AdjuvantCyclophosphamideDocetaxelEpirubicinFemaleFluorouracilGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAntineoplastic AgentsCyclophosphamideDocetaxelEpirubicinFluorouracilGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID24996828
OpenAlexW1984901136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.