Trial reportTrials2014
Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions.
Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02160249 (RISE), which is not on this map. Cited by 358 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
RISE (Rehabilitation Intervention for People With Schizophrenia in Ethiopia): a Cluster-randomised Trial
Who cites it
358 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The role of pharmacists in mitigating medication errors in the perioperative setting: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of pharmacist care on clinical outcomes and therapy optimization in perioperative settings: A systematic review.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024Pooled it
- Sarcopenia interventions in long-term care facilities targeting sedentary behaviour and physical inactivity: A systematic review.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2024Pooled it
- Adaptability, Scalability and Sustainability (ASaS) of complex health interventions: a systematic review of theories, models and frameworks.Implementation science : IS · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review of behavioural and exercise interventions for the prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Pooled it
- Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- What do we want to get out of this? a critical interpretive synthesis of the value of process evaluations, with a practical planning framework.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Pooled it
- Interventions for self-management of medicines for community-dwelling people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment and their family carers: a systematic review.Age and ageing · 2022Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Studies Describing the Effectiveness, Acceptability, and Potential Harms of Place-Based Interventions to Address Loneliness and Mental Health Problems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Implementation of peer support for people with severe mental health conditions in high-, middle- and low-income-countries: a theory of change approach.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Enhancing the quality of psychological interventions delivered by telephone in mental health services: increasing the likelihood of successful implementation using a theory of change.BMC psychiatry · 2023Trial
- Palliative care development as a solution to mitigate the human crisis of cancer in low- and middle-income countries: a theory of change approach.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- [From clinical practice to interventional study : Adaptation of a local approach to therapeutic and rehabilitative care to a complex intervention in the "SGB Reha" project].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026Review
- Empowering Parent Carers of Children With Neurodisability in Healthcare Settings: Co-Producing a Theory of Change for Intervention Development.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Co-Design of the MAGNET Intervention to Enhance Medicines Self-Management in Community-Dwelling People With Dementia and Their Family Carers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Economic Evaluation of a Digital Psychobehavioral Intervention for Chronic Inflammatory Skin Disease (MindMySkin): Protocol for a Trial-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Implementation of primary palliative care interventions across six sub-Saharan African countries: understanding contextual determinants and lessons learnt.Family medicine and community health · 2026Article
- Optimized surgical treatment and study management for oncology patients in East Saxony (MISSION4Sax): study protocol of a multicentre pilot study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Development and National Implementation of a Standardized Physiotherapy Assessment Package for Pediatric Asthma and Dysfunctional Breathing.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Article
298 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Medical Research Councils' framework for complex interventions has been criticized for not including theory-driven approaches to evaluation. Although the framework does include broad guidance on the use of theory, it contains little practical guidance for implementers and there have been calls to develop a more comprehensive approach. A prospective, theory-driven process of intervention design and evaluation is required to develop complex healthcare interventions which are more likely to be effective, sustainable and scalable.
methodsWe propose a theory-driven approach to the design and evaluation of complex interventions by adapting and integrating a programmatic design and evaluation tool, Theory of Change (ToC), into the MRC framework for complex interventions. We provide a guide to what ToC is, how to construct one, and how to integrate its use into research projects seeking to design, implement and evaluate complex interventions using the MRC framework. We test this approach by using ToC within two randomized controlled trials and one non-randomized evaluation of complex interventions.
resultsOur application of ToC in three research projects has shown that ToC can strengthen key stages of the MRC framework. It can aid the development of interventions by providing a framework for enhanced stakeholder engagement and by explicitly designing an intervention that is embedded in the local context. For the feasibility and piloting stage, ToC enables the systematic identification of knowledge gaps to generate research questions that strengthen intervention design. ToC may improve the evaluation of interventions by providing a comprehensive set of indicators to evaluate all stages of the causal pathway through which an intervention achieves impact, combining evaluations of intervention effectiveness with detailed process evaluations into one theoretical framework.
conclusionsIncorporating a ToC approach into the MRC framework holds promise for improving the design and evaluation of complex interventions, thereby increasing the likelihood that the intervention will be ultimately effective, sustainable and scalable. We urge researchers developing and evaluating complex interventions to consider using this approach, to evaluate its usefulness and to build an evidence base to further refine the methodology.
trial registrationClinical trials.gov: NCT02160249.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.