Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24996573›Full record

Trial reportInjury2014

Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) Trial: design, rationale and implementation.

Sarah Baraniuk, Barbara C Tilley, Deborah J del Junco, Erin E Fox, Gerald van Belle, Charles E Wade, Jeanette M Podbielski, Angela M Beeler, John R Hess, Eileen M Bulger and 14 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Injury, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Blood transfusion strategies for major bleeding in trauma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Examining 1:1 vs. 4:1 Packed Red Blood Cell to Fresh Frozen Plasma Ratio Transfusion During Pediatric Burn Excision.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah BaraniukDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States. Electronic address: Mary.Baraniuk@uth.tmc.edu.
Barbara C TilleyDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States.
Deborah J del JuncoCenter for Translational Injury Research, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States.
Erin E FoxCenter for Translational Injury Research, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States.
Gerald van BelleDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences and Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, United States.
Charles E WadeCenter for Translational Injury Research, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States.
Jeanette M PodbielskiCenter for Translational Injury Research, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States.
Angela M BeelerCenter for Translational Injury Research, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States.
John R HessDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, United States.
Eileen M BulgerDivision of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Washington, United States.
Martin A SchreiberDivision of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, United States.
Kenji InabaDivision of Trauma and Critical Care, University of Southern California, United States.
Timothy C FabianDivision of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, United States.
Jeffrey D KerbyDivision of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States.
Mitchell Jay CohenDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
Christopher N MillerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, United States.
Sandro RizoliTrauma and Acute Care Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada.
Thomas M ScaleaR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, United States.
Terence O'KeeffeDivision of Trauma, Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, United States.
Karen J BraselDivision of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, United States.
Bryan A CottonCenter for Translational Injury Research, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States.
Peter MuskatDivision of Trauma/Critical Care, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, United States.
John B HolcombCenter for Translational Injury Research, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States.
PROPPR Study Group
The University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Washington · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USOregon Health & Science University · USSouthern California University for Professional Studies · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Tennessee System · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Data Coordinating CenterU01HL077863 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAY, SUSANNE · 2004 to 2015
$125.1M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
Training Program in Biostatistics at UTHSCH-SPHT32GM074902 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI DESANTIS, STACIA · 2006 to 2018
$1.4M
CIHRNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077863NHLBI NIH HHS U01HL077863NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM074902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundForty percent of in-hospital deaths among injured patients involve massive truncal haemorrhage. These deaths may be prevented with rapid haemorrhage control and improved resuscitation techniques. The Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) Trial was designed to determine if there is a difference in mortality between subjects who received different ratios of FDA approved blood products. This report describes the design and implementation of PROPPR. STUDY

designPROPPR was designed as a randomized, two-group, Phase III trial conducted in subjects with the highest level of trauma activation and predicted to have a massive transfusion. Subjects at 12 North American level 1 trauma centres were randomized into one of two standard transfusion ratio interventions: 1:1:1 or 1:1:2, (plasma, platelets, and red blood cells). Clinical data and serial blood samples were collected under Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC) regulations. Co-primary mortality endpoints of 24h and 30 days were evaluated.

resultsBetween August 2012 and December 2013, 680 patients were randomized. The overall median time from admission to randomization was 26min. PROPPR enrolled at higher than expected rates with fewer than expected protocol deviations.

conclusionPROPPR is the largest randomized study to enrol severely bleeding patients. This study showed that rapidly enrolling and successfully providing randomized blood products to severely injured patients in an EFIC study is feasible. PROPPR was able to achieve these goals by utilizing a collaborative structure and developing successful procedures and design elements that can be part of future trauma studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBlood PlateletsBlood TransfusionChildChild, PreschoolExsanguinationFemaleHemorrhageHemostasisHospital MortalityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePhenotypeClinical trialPlasmaPlateletsResuscitationTransfusionTrauma

Identifiers

PMID24996573
PMCPMC4137482
OpenAlexW2004195549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.