Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24996111›Full record

ArticlePhysical review letters2014

Repulsive DNA-DNA interactions accelerate viral DNA packaging in phage Phi29.

Nicholas Keller, Damian delToro, Shelley Grimes, Paul J Jardine, Douglas E Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Optical Tweezers to Study Viruses.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Screened DNA packs faster.Nature materials · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas KellerDepartment of Physics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
Damian delToroDepartment of Physics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
Shelley GrimesDepartment of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences and Institute for Molecular Virology, University of Minnesota, 515 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Paul J JardineDepartment of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences and Institute for Molecular Virology, University of Minnesota, 515 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Douglas E SmithDepartment of Physics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, California 92093, USA.

Funding

Mechanisms of Viral DNA Packaging: Biophysical, Biochemical, & Genetic AnalysisR01GM088186 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CATALANO, CARLOS ENRIQUE, FEISS, MICHAEL · 2011 to 2014
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088186NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM088186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We use optical tweezers to study the effect of attractive versus repulsive DNA-DNA interactions on motor-driven viral packaging. Screening of repulsive interactions accelerates packaging, but induction of attractive interactions by spermidine(3+) causes heterogeneous dynamics. Acceleration is observed in a fraction of complexes, but most exhibit slowing and stalling, suggesting that attractive interactions promote nonequilibrium DNA conformations that impede the motor. Thus, repulsive interactions facilitate packaging despite increasing the energy of the theoretical optimum spooled DNA conformation.

Indexed as

DNA PackagingBacteriophagesDNA, ViralNucleic Acid ConformationOptical TweezersDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID24996111
PMCPMC5001848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.