Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24995869›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2014

Examining variation in recombination levels in the human female: a test of the production-line hypothesis.

Ross Rowsey, Jennifer Gruhn, Karl W Broman, Patricia A Hunt, Terry Hassold

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Failure to recombine is a common feature of human oogenesis.American journal of human genetics · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Crossover Interference, Crossover Maturation, and Human Aneuploidy.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Oocyte development, meiosis and aneuploidy.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ross RowseySchool of Molecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Jennifer GruhnSchool of Molecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Karl W BromanDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Patricia A HuntSchool of Molecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Terry HassoldSchool of Molecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. Electronic address: terryhassold@vetmed.wsu.edu.
Washington State University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

A Program of Research in Population CytogeneticsR37HD021341 · NICHD · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HASSOLD, TERRY J · 2010 to 2019
$5.8M
A PROGRAM OF RESEARCH IN POPULATION CYTOGENETICSR01HD021341 · NICHD · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI HASSOLD, TERRY J · 1985 to 2009
$5.7M
Meiotic Studies of Chemicals With Estrogenic ActivityR01ES013527 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HUNT, PATRICIA · 2005 to 2014
$4.5M
Molecular Bioscience Graduate Training ProgramT32GM083864 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NILSON, JOHN H. · 2010 to 2014
$646k
NICHD NIH HHS HD21341NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD021341NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD021341NIEHS NIH HHS ES013527NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES013527NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM083864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most important risk factor for human aneuploidy is increasing maternal age, but the basis of this association remains unknown. Indeed, one of the earliest models of the maternal-age effect--the "production-line model" proposed by Henderson and Edwards in 1968--remains one of the most-cited explanations. The model has two key components: (1) that the first oocytes to enter meiosis are the first ovulated and (2) that the first to enter meiosis have more recombination events (crossovers) than those that enter meiosis later in fetal life. Studies in rodents have demonstrated that the first oocytes to enter meiosis are indeed the first to be ovulated, but the association between the timing of meiotic entry and recombination levels has not been tested. We recently initiated molecular cytogenetic studies of second-trimester human fetal ovaries, allowing us to directly examine the number and distribution of crossover-associated proteins in prophase-stage oocytes. Our observations on over 8,000 oocytes from 191 ovarian samples demonstrate extraordinary variation in recombination within and among individuals but provide no evidence of a difference in recombination levels between oocytes entering meiosis early in fetal life and those entering late in fetal life. Thus, our data provide a direct test of the second tenet of the production-line model and suggest that it does not provide a plausible explanation for the human maternal-age effect, meaning that-45 years after its introduction-we can finally conclude that the production-line model is not the basis for the maternal-age effect on trisomy.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationRecombination, GeneticFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansOocytes

Identifiers

PMID24995869
PMCPMC4085639
OpenAlexW2060907936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.