Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24995660›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma2014

Distribution of asthma by occupation: Washington State behavioral risk factor surveillance system data, 2006-2009.

Naomi J Anderson, Zihong Joyce Fan, Carolyn Reeb-Whitaker, David K Bonauto, Edmund Rauser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Respiratory health, occupation and the healthy worker effect.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Teacher respiratory health symptoms in relation to school and home environment.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Patient-physician communication about work-related asthma: what we do and do not know.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Naomi J AndersonSafety and Health Assessment and Research for Prevention (SHARP) Program, Washington State Department of Labor and Industries , Olympia, Washington , USA.
Zihong Joyce Fan
Carolyn Reeb-Whitaker
David K Bonauto
Edmund Rauser

Funding

Washington Occupational Surveillance ProgramU60OH008487 · OH · WASHINGTON STATE DEPT LAB &INDUST · PI BONAUTO, DAVID K, WUELLNER, SARA · 2005 to 2025
$11.5M
NIOSH CDC HHS 5U60 OH008487NIOSH CDC HHS U60 OH008487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the prevalence of asthma in workers by occupation in Washington State.

methodsData from the 2006-2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and the BRFSS Asthma Call-Back Survey (ACBS) in Washington State (WA) were analyzed. Using state-added and coded Industry and Occupation questions, we calculated prevalence ratios (PRs) for 19 occupational groups.

resultsOf the 41,935 respondents who were currently employed during 2006-2009, the prevalence of current asthma was 8.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8-8.5%] When compared with the reference group of executive, administration and managerial occupations, three occupational groups had significantly (p < 0.05) higher PRs of current asthma: "Teachers, all levels, and Counselors' (PR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1. 6%); 'Administrative Support, including Clerical" (PR 1. 5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9%); and "Other Health Services" (PR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9). Half of the 2511 ACBS respondent workers (55.1%) indicated that they believed exposure at work had caused or worsened their asthma, but only 10.7% had ever spoken with a health care professional about their asthma being work related.

conclusionsSome occupations have a higher prevalence of current asthma than other occupations. The systematic collection of industry and occupation data can help identify worker populations with a high burden of asthma and can be used to target disease prevention efforts as well as to aid clinician recognition and treatment. Workers indicated that work-related asthma exposures are not discussed with their health care provider and this communication gap has implications for asthma management.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsthmaBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemFemaleHumansMaleOccupational DiseasesOccupationsPrevalenceRegression AnalysisWashingtonYoung AdultBRFSSindustrylung diseaseoccupational asthmaoccupational healthprevalencework related

Identifiers

PMID24995660
PMCPMC4266043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.