Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24995149›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2014

Systematic analysis of the ability of Nitric Oxide donors to dislodge biofilms formed by Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Massimiliano Marvasi, Charles Chen, Manuel Carrazana, Ian A Durie, Max Teplitski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Controlling Biofilm Development Through Cyclic di-GMP Signaling.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Potential of oxygen and nitrogen reactive intermediates to disperse Listeria monocytogenes from biofilms.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Modulation of EnterohaemorrhagicMicroorganisms · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Massimiliano MarvasiSoil and Water Science Department, University of Florida-IFAS, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Charles ChenMicrobiology and Cell Science Department, University of Florida-IFAS, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Manuel CarrazanaMicrobiology and Cell Science Department, University of Florida-IFAS, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Ian A DurieSoil and Water Science Department, University of Florida-IFAS, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Max TeplitskiSoil and Water Science Department, University of Florida-IFAS, Gainesville, FL, USA ; Cancer and Genetics Research Center, Genetics Institute, 2033 Mowry Road, Gainesville 32611, FL, USA.
University of Florida · USCancer Genetics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms in the industrial environment could be problematic. Encased in extracellular polymeric substances, pathogens within biofilms are significantly more resistant to chlorine and other disinfectants. Recent studies suggest that compounds capable of manipulating nitric oxide-mediated signaling in bacteria could induce dispersal of sessile bacteria and provide a foundation for novel approaches to controlling biofilms formed by some microorganisms. In this work, we compared the ability of five nitric oxide donors (molsidomine, MAHMA NONOate, diethylamine NONOate, diethylamine NONOate diethylammonium salt, spermine NONOate) to dislodge biofilms formed by non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica and pathogenic E. coli on plastic and stainless steel surfaces at different temperatures. All five nitric oxide donors induced significant (35-80%) dispersal of biofilms, however, the degree of dispersal and the optimal dispersal conditions varied. MAHMA NONOate and molsidomine were strong dispersants of the Salmonella biofilms formed on polystyrene. Importantly, molsidomine induced dispersal of up to 50% of the pre-formed Salmonella biofilm at 4°C, suggesting that it could be effective even under refrigerated conditions. Biofilms formed by E. coli O157:H7 were also significantly dispersed. Nitric oxide donor molecules were highly active within 6 hours of application. To better understand mode of action of these compounds, we identified Salmonella genomic region recA-hydN, deletion of which led to an insensitivity to the nitric oxide donors.

Indexed as

Bacterial signalingBiofilm controlFood-borne pathogensNitric oxide

Identifiers

PMID24995149
PMCPMC4070026
OpenAlexW2113654470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.