Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24995085›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2014

Performance of osteopontin in the diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a meta-analysis.

Hui Lin, Yong-Chun Shen, Hong-Yu Long, Hao Wang, Ze-Yu Luo, Zi-Xuan Wei, Shi-Qi Hu, Fu-Qiang Wen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. HMGB1 and Its Hyperacetylated Isoform are Sensitive and Specific Serum Biomarkers to Detect Asbestos Exposure and to Identify Mesothelioma Patients.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Biomarkers in the diagnosis of pleural diseases: a 2018 update.Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hui LinDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu, China.
Yong-Chun ShenDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of China and Department of Respiratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu, China.
Hong-Yu LongDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of China and Department of Respiratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu, China.
Hao WangDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of China and Department of Respiratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu, China.
Ze-Yu LuoWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University Chengdu, China.
Zi-Xuan WeiWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University Chengdu, China.
Shi-Qi HuWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University Chengdu, China.
Fu-Qiang WenDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of China and Department of Respiratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is reported that osteopontin has shown promising diagnostic value for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), this meta-analysis aimed to establish the overall diagnostic accuracy of the osteopontin measurement for diagnosing MPM. Based on a systematic review of English language studies, the sensitivity, specificity and other measures of accuracy of osteopontin in the diagnosis of MPM were pooled using random-effects model. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize overall test performance. Seven publications met our inclusion criteria, the pooled sensitivity was 0.57 (95%CI: 0.52-0.61), specificity was 0.81, 95%CI: 0.79-0.84). The PLR was 3.78 (95%CI: 2.23-6.41), the NLR was 0.51 (95%CI: 0.38-0.67) and the DOR was 9.04 (95%CI: 5.28-15.48), the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.80. Our data suggest that osteopontin is likely to be a useful diagnostic marker for MPM, considering for the limited studies and patients included, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

malignant pleural mesotheliomameta-analysisOsteopontin

Identifiers

PMID24995085
PMCPMC4073746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.