Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24995004›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014

Communities of microbial eukaryotes in the mammalian gut within the context of environmental eukaryotic diversity.

Laura Wegener Parfrey, William A Walters, Christian L Lauber, Jose C Clemente, Donna Berg-Lyons, Clotilde Teiling, Chinnappa Kodira, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Julie Brunelle, Mark Driscoll and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Taxonomy of the GenusPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura Wegener ParfreyBiofrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA.
William A WaltersDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA.
Christian L LauberCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA.
Jose C ClementeBiofrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA.
Donna Berg-LyonsBiofrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA.
Clotilde Teiling454 Life Sciences, Roche Company Branford, CT, USA.
Chinnappa Kodira454 Life Sciences, Roche Company Branford, CT, USA.
Mohammed Mohiuddin454 Life Sciences, Roche Company Branford, CT, USA.
Julie Brunelle454 Life Sciences, Roche Company Branford, CT, USA.
Mark Driscoll454 Life Sciences, Roche Company Branford, CT, USA.
Noah FiererCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA ; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA.
Jack A GilbertDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA ; Institute of Genomic and Systems Biology, Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL, USA.
Rob KnightBiofrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Boulder · USCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

TRAINING IN SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION &CELL CYCLE REGULATIONT32GM008759 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI AHN, NATALIE G. · 2000 to 2020
$5.9M
Predoctoral Training Program in Signaling and Cellular Regulation INCLUDE Down Syndrome SupplementT32GM142607 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Sabrina Leigh Spencer, Tin Tin Su · 2021 to 2026
$3.6M
New Tools for Understanding the Composition and Dynamics of Microbial CommunitiesR01HG004872 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI KNIGHT, ROB · 2008 to 2012
$1.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004872NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008759NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM142607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic microbes (protists) residing in the vertebrate gut influence host health and disease, but their diversity and distribution in healthy hosts is poorly understood. Protists found in the gut are typically considered parasites, but many are commensal and some are beneficial. Further, the hygiene hypothesis predicts that association with our co-evolved microbial symbionts may be important to overall health. It is therefore imperative that we understand the normal diversity of our eukaryotic gut microbiota to test for such effects and avoid eliminating commensal organisms. We assembled a dataset of healthy individuals from two populations, one with traditional, agrarian lifestyles and a second with modern, westernized lifestyles, and characterized the human eukaryotic microbiota via high-throughput sequencing. To place the human gut microbiota within a broader context our dataset also includes gut samples from diverse mammals and samples from other aquatic and terrestrial environments. We curated the SILVA ribosomal database to reflect current knowledge of eukaryotic taxonomy and employ it as a phylogenetic framework to compare eukaryotic diversity across environment. We show that adults from the non-western population harbor a diverse community of protists, and diversity in the human gut is comparable to that in other mammals. However, the eukaryotic microbiota of the western population appears depauperate. The distribution of symbionts found in mammals reflects both host phylogeny and diet. Eukaryotic microbiota in the gut are less diverse and more patchily distributed than bacteria. More broadly, we show that eukaryotic communities in the gut are less diverse than in aquatic and terrestrial habitats, and few taxa are shared across habitat types, and diversity patterns of eukaryotes are correlated with those observed for bacteria. These results outline the distribution and diversity of microbial eukaryotic communities in the mammalian gut and across environments.

Indexed as

host-associated eukaryoteshuman microbiomeintestinal protozoamicrobial diversitymicrobial ecologyparasitesprotistsalinity

Identifiers

PMID24995004
PMCPMC4063188
OpenAlexW1986514730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.