ReviewClinical proteomics2014
Proteogenomic convergence for understanding cancer pathways and networks.
Review in Clinical proteomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Cancer-Associated Membrane Protein as Targeted Therapy for Bladder Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Proteomics Study of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Like Cells Obtained from Tumor Microenvironment of Patients with Malignant and Benign Salivary Gland Tumors.Cell journal · 2022Article
- Review
- Temporal Modulation of Differential Alternative Splicing in HaCaT Human Keratinocyte Cell Line Chronically Exposed to Arsenic for up to 28 Wk.Environmental health perspectives · 2022Article
- Microfluidic Single-Cell Proteomics Assay Chip: Lung Cancer Cell Line Case Study.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Glycoproteogenomics: Setting the Course for Next-generation Cancer Neoantigen Discovery for Cancer Vaccines.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Proteomic Profiling of Colon Cancer Tissues: Discovery of New Candidate Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Clinical potential of mass spectrometry-based proteogenomics.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019Review
- Proteome-wide Tyrosine Phosphorylation Analysis Reveals Dysregulated Signaling Pathways in Ovarian Tumors.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2019Article
- Magnolin targeting of ERK1/2 inhibits cell proliferation and colony growth by induction of cellular senescence in ovarian cancer cells.Molecular carcinogenesis · 2019Article
- Integrative proteomics in prostate cancer uncovers robustness against genomic and transcriptomic aberrations during disease progression.Nature communications · 2018Article
- A novel anti-CD146 antibody specifically targets cancer cells by internalizing the molecule.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- A Timely Shift from Shotgun to Targeted Proteomics and How It Can Be Groundbreaking for Cancer Research.Frontiers in oncology · 2017Review
- Cofilin-1 and Other ADF/Cofilin Superfamily Members in Human Malignant Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Review
- Differential Neuroproteomic and Systems Biology Analysis of Spinal Cord Injury.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2016Article
- Urinary proteomics and metabolomics studies to monitor bladder health and urological diseases.BMC urology · 2016Review
- Experimental detection of short regulatory motifs in eukaryotic proteins: tips for good practice as well as for bad.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2015Review
- A Pilot Proteogenomic Study with Data Integration Identifies MCT1 and GLUT1 as Prognostic Markers in Lung Adenocarcinoma.PloS one · 2015Article
- Reverse phase protein arrays: mapping the path towards personalized medicine.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the past several decades, the understanding of cancer at the molecular level has been primarily focused on mechanisms on how signaling molecules transform homeostatically balanced cells into malignant ones within an individual pathway. However, it is becoming more apparent that pathways are dynamic and crosstalk at different control points of the signaling cascades, making the traditional linear signaling models inadequate to interpret complex biological systems. Recent technological advances in high throughput, deep sequencing for the human genomes and proteomic technologies to comprehensively characterize the human proteomes in conjunction with multiplexed targeted proteomic assays to measure panels of proteins involved in biologically relevant pathways have made significant progress in understanding cancer at the molecular level. It is undeniable that proteomic profiling of differentially expressed proteins under many perturbation conditions, or between normal and "diseased" states is important to capture a first glance at the overall proteomic landscape, which has been a main focus of proteomics research during the past 15-20 years. However, the research community is gradually shifting its heavy focus from that initial discovery step to protein target verification using multiplexed quantitative proteomic assays, capable of measuring changes in proteins and their interacting partners, isoforms, and post-translational modifications (PTMs) in response to stimuli in the context of signaling pathways and protein networks. With a critical link to genotypes (i.e., high throughput genomics and transcriptomics data), new and complementary information can be gleaned from multi-dimensional omics data to (1) assess the effect of genomic and transcriptomic aberrations on such complex molecular machinery in the context of cell signaling architectures associated with pathological diseases such as cancer (i.e., from genotype to proteotype to phenotype); and (2) target pathway- and network-driven changes and map the fluctuations of these functional units (proteins) responsible for cellular activities in response to perturbation in a spatiotemporal fashion to better understand cancer biology as a whole system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.