Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24994920›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2014

Impact of a clinical trial initiative on clinical trial enrollment in a multidisciplinary prostate cancer clinic.

Lydia T Madsen, Deborah A Kuban, Seungtaek Choi, John W Davis, Jeri Kim, Andrew K Lee, Delora Domain, Larry Levy, Louis L Pisters, Curtis A Pettaway and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lydia T MadsenFrom the Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Deborah A KubanFrom the Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Seungtaek ChoiFrom the Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
John W DavisFrom the Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jeri KimFrom the Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Andrew K LeeFrom the Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Delora DomainFrom the Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Larry LevyFrom the Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Louis L PistersFrom the Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Curtis A PettawayFrom the Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
John F WardFrom the Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Christopher LogothetisFrom the Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Karen E HoffmanFrom the Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical oncology trials are hampered by low accrual rates, with fewer than 5% of adult patients with cancer treated on study. Clinical trial enrollment was evaluated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center's Multidisciplinary Prostate Cancer Clinic (MPCC) to assess whether a clinical trial initiative, introduced in 2006, impacted enrollment. The trial initiative included posting trial-specific information in clinic, educating patients about appropriate clinical trial options during the treatment recommendation discussion, and providing patients with trial-specific educational information. The investigators evaluated the frequency of clinical trial enrollment for men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer seen in the MPCC from 2004 to 2008. Logistic regression evaluated the impact of patient characteristics and the clinical trial initiative on trial enrollment. The median age of the 1370 men was 64 years; 32% had low-risk, 49% had intermediate-risk, and 19% had high-risk disease. Overall, 74% enrolled in at least one trial and 29% enrolled in more than one trial. Trial enrollment increased from 39% before the initiative (127/326) to 84% (880/1044) after the trial initiative. Patient enrollment increased in laboratory studies (from 25% to 80%), quality-of-life studies (from 10% to 26%), and studies evaluating investigational treatments and systemic agents (from 6% to 15%) after the trial initiative. In multivariate analysis, younger men (P<.001) and men seen after implementation of the clinical trial initiative (P<.001) were more likely to enroll in trials. Clinical trial enrollment in the MPCC was substantially higher than that seen nationally in adult patients with cancer, and enrollment rates increased after the introduction of a clinical trial initiative.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPatient SelectionAgedHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePatient Education as TopicProstatic NeoplasmsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24994920
PMCPMC4413899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.