Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24994919›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2014

Building the palliative care evidence base: Lessons from a randomized controlled trial of oxygen vs room air for refractory dyspnea.

Thomas W LeBlanc, Amy P Abernethy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas W LeBlancFrom the Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine; Center for Learning Health Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute; and Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.From the Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine; Center for Learning Health Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute; and Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Amy P AbernethyFrom the Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine; Center for Learning Health Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute; and Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.From the Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine; Center for Learning Health Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute; and Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Clinical Research Institute · USDuke University · US

Funding

Creation and demonstration of a palliative care research cooperative groupUC4NR012584 · NINR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ABERNETHY, AMY P., KUTNER, JEAN S · 2010 to 2010
$7.2M
NINR NIH HHS UC4 NR012584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Palliative care is increasingly seen as a standard component of high-quality comprehensive cancer care. However, several challenges remain to its widespread integration into clinical oncology practice, including workforce problems, reimbursement concerns, and a fledgling evidence base. This article discusses issues surrounding evidence base development in palliative cancer care, using the example of a recently published randomized controlled trial of oxygen versus room air. The Oxygen Trial randomized patients with refractory dyspnea and adequate Pao2 to oxygen or room air, administered via nasal cannula. Both groups experienced improvements in self-rated dyspnea scores, but no statistical differences were seen between intervention arms. These results suggest that supplementary oxygen is often unnecessary in the palliative setting, and that room air is similarly efficacious. This example highlights the importance and need for ongoing development of the evidence base in palliative medicine. The Palliative Care Research Cooperative (PCRC) is a novel National Institute of Nursing Research-funded research infrastructure that seeks to expand the palliative care evidence base. Its first multisite trial was recently completed, assessing the pragmatic question of whether statin medications can be safely discontinued in end-of-life settings. The PCRC will be a vehicle through which a high-quality evidence base will continue to expand and develop. Such ongoing research efforts are needed to inform and improve palliative care practice.

Indexed as

AirDyspneaHumansNeoplasmsOxygenPalliative CareOxygen

Identifiers

PMID24994919
PMCPMC4158402
OpenAlexW1897804875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.