Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24994842›Full record

Trial reportNeurology2014

Treatment outcome after failure of a first antiepileptic drug.

Laura J Bonnett, Catrin Tudur Smith, Sarah Donegan, Anthony G Marson

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Seizure Forecasting and the Preictal State in Canine Epilepsy.International journal of neural systems · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura J BonnettFrom the Departments of Biostatistics (L.J.B., C.T.S., S.D.) and Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology (A.G.M.), University of Liverpool, UK.
Catrin Tudur SmithFrom the Departments of Biostatistics (L.J.B., C.T.S., S.D.) and Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology (A.G.M.), University of Liverpool, UK.
Sarah DoneganFrom the Departments of Biostatistics (L.J.B., C.T.S., S.D.) and Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology (A.G.M.), University of Liverpool, UK.
Anthony G MarsonFrom the Departments of Biostatistics (L.J.B., C.T.S., S.D.) and Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology (A.G.M.), University of Liverpool, UK. A.G.Marson@liverpool.ac.uk.
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0606-1062Medical Research Council MR/K021435/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe assessed the likelihood of 12-month seizure remission and treatment failure after failure of a first antiepileptic drug, and identified factors influencing these outcomes.

methodsSANAD (Standard and New Antiepileptic Drug) was a randomized controlled trial comparing monotherapy with standard and new antiepileptic drugs. Patients were followed up to study completion, even if they were switched from their randomized treatment. After a first treatment failure, we assessed the probability of 12-month seizure remission and treatment failure. Prognostic modeling identified predictors of these outcomes.

resultsForty-four percent of patients in the SANAD trial had a first treatment failure. Seventy-five percent of these subsequently achieved 12-month remission by 6 years of follow-up. Significant prognostic factors included sex, age at treatment failure, time on randomized treatment at treatment failure, neurologic insult, total number of tonic-clonic seizures at treatment failure, reason for treatment failure, seizure type, and CT/MRI scan result. After a first treatment failure, young patients without tonic-clonic seizures, with a normal CT/MRI scan and failing their treatment because of unacceptable adverse events, had the highest likelihood of 12-month remission. Approximately 50% of patients who failed a first treatment also failed their second. Significant prognostic factors included total number of tonic-clonic seizures at first treatment failure, reason for first treatment failure, and CT/MRI scan result. Patients with tonic-clonic seizures and failing because of inadequate seizure control had the highest risk of a second treatment failure.

conclusionsA high proportion of patients will achieve 12-month remission after a first treatment failure. Clinical factors can stratify patients according to likely outcome.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnticonvulsantsEpilepsyFemaleFructoseHumansLamotrigineMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsTopiramateTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeTriazinesValproic AcidAnticonvulsantsFructoseLamotrigineTopiramateTriazinesValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID24994842
PMCPMC4142004
OpenAlexW1994825668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.