Trial reportNeurology2014
Treatment outcome after failure of a first antiepileptic drug.
Trial report in Neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in antiseizure medications response in people with epilepsy: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Breakthrough seizures-Further analysis of the Standard versus New Antiepileptic Drugs (SANAD) study.PloS one · 2017Trial
- Long-term outcomes of corpus callosotomy in adult patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: Results from a single neurosurgical center in Mexico.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Article
- Epilepsy Characteristics in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Research from Patient Cohorts and Animal Models Focusing on Autism Spectrum Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Effect of cognitive behavioral intervention on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with epilepsy.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Response to subsequent antiseizure medications after first antiseizure medication failure in newly diagnosed epilepsy.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Prognostic Implications of Epilepsy Onset Age According to Relapse Pattern in Patients with Four-Year Remission.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Collaborative scientific production of epilepsy in Latin America from 1989 to 2018: A bibliometric analysis.Heliyon · 2020Article
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: Present and Future Perspectives.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Seizure Forecasting and the Preictal State in Canine Epilepsy.International journal of neural systems · 2017Article
- Patterns of care of brain tumor-related epilepsy. A cohort study done in Italian Epilepsy Center.PloS one · 2017Article
- Epilepsy in adults with mitochondrial disease: A cohort study.Annals of neurology · 2015Article
- SANAD II: Dear Levetiracetam, the Honeymoon Is Over.Epilepsy currentsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe assessed the likelihood of 12-month seizure remission and treatment failure after failure of a first antiepileptic drug, and identified factors influencing these outcomes.
methodsSANAD (Standard and New Antiepileptic Drug) was a randomized controlled trial comparing monotherapy with standard and new antiepileptic drugs. Patients were followed up to study completion, even if they were switched from their randomized treatment. After a first treatment failure, we assessed the probability of 12-month seizure remission and treatment failure. Prognostic modeling identified predictors of these outcomes.
resultsForty-four percent of patients in the SANAD trial had a first treatment failure. Seventy-five percent of these subsequently achieved 12-month remission by 6 years of follow-up. Significant prognostic factors included sex, age at treatment failure, time on randomized treatment at treatment failure, neurologic insult, total number of tonic-clonic seizures at treatment failure, reason for treatment failure, seizure type, and CT/MRI scan result. After a first treatment failure, young patients without tonic-clonic seizures, with a normal CT/MRI scan and failing their treatment because of unacceptable adverse events, had the highest likelihood of 12-month remission. Approximately 50% of patients who failed a first treatment also failed their second. Significant prognostic factors included total number of tonic-clonic seizures at first treatment failure, reason for first treatment failure, and CT/MRI scan result. Patients with tonic-clonic seizures and failing because of inadequate seizure control had the highest risk of a second treatment failure.
conclusionsA high proportion of patients will achieve 12-month remission after a first treatment failure. Clinical factors can stratify patients according to likely outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.