Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24994761›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2014

Loss of the two major leaf isoforms of sucrose-phosphate synthase in Arabidopsis thaliana limits sucrose synthesis and nocturnal starch degradation but does not alter carbon partitioning during photosynthesis.

Kathrin Volkert, Stefan Debast, Lars M Voll, Hildegard Voll, Ingrid Schießl, Jörg Hofmann, Sabine Schneider, Frederik Börnke

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome-Wide Identification ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Making watercress (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathrin VolkertFriedrich-Alexander-Universität, Department of Biology, Division of Biochemistry, Staudtstr. 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Stefan DebastFriedrich-Alexander-Universität, Department of Biology, Division of Biochemistry, Staudtstr. 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Lars M VollFriedrich-Alexander-Universität, Department of Biology, Division of Biochemistry, Staudtstr. 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Hildegard VollFriedrich-Alexander-Universität, Department of Biology, Division of Biochemistry, Staudtstr. 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Ingrid SchießlFriedrich-Alexander-Universität, Department of Biology, Division of Biochemistry, Staudtstr. 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Jörg HofmannFriedrich-Alexander-Universität, Department of Biology, Division of Biochemistry, Staudtstr. 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Sabine SchneiderFriedrich-Alexander-Universität, Department of Biology, Molecular Plant Physiology, Staudtstr. 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Frederik BörnkeLeibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ), Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg 1, D-14979 Großbeeren, Germany boernke@igzev.de.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DELeibniz Association · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sucrose (Suc)-phosphate synthase (SPS) catalyses one of the rate-limiting steps in the synthesis of Suc in plants. The Arabidopsis genome contains four annotated SPS genes which can be grouped into three different families (SPSA1, SPSA2, SPSB, and SPSC). However, the functional significance of this multiplicity of SPS genes is as yet only poorly understood. All four SPS isoforms show enzymatic activity when expressed in yeast although there is variation in sensitivity towards allosteric effectors. Promoter-reporter gene analyses and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR studies indicate that no two SPS genes have the same expression pattern and that AtSPSA1 and AtSPSC represent the major isoforms expressed in leaves. An spsa1 knock-out mutant showed a 44% decrease in leaf SPS activity and a slight increase in leaf starch content at the end of the light period as well as at the end of the dark period. The spsc null mutant displayed reduced Suc contents towards the end of the photoperiod and a concomitant 25% reduction in SPS activity. In contrast, an spsa1/spsc double mutant was strongly impaired in growth and accumulated high levels of starch. This increase in starch was probably not due to an increased partitioning of carbon into starch, but was rather caused by an impaired starch mobilization during the night. Suc export from excised petioles harvested from spsa1/spsc double mutant plants was significantly reduced under illumination as well as during the dark period. It is concluded that loss of the two major SPS isoforms in leaves limits Suc synthesis without grossly changing carbon partitioning in favour of starch during the light period but limits starch degradation during the dark period.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisCarbonGlucosyltransferasesPhotosynthesisStarchSucroseCarbonGlucosyltransferasesStarchSucrosesucrose-phosphate synthaseArabidopsis thalianaenzyme familystarch metabolismsucrose biosynthesissucrose-phosphate synthase.

Identifiers

PMID24994761
PMCPMC4400537
OpenAlexW2124628768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.