ReviewSchizophrenia research2014
Brain circuit dysfunction in a distinct subset of chronic psychotic patients.
Review in Schizophrenia research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of severe and chronic factors for extended stays in Japanese medical treatment and supervision act wards.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Sodium Homeostasis, a Balance Necessary for Life.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Psychogenic polydipsia in a female adolescent without a psychiatric background: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2021Article
- Distinct CCK-positive SFO neurons are involved in persistent or transient suppression of water intake.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Primary polydipsia: Update.Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism · 2020Review
- Review
- The Neurocircuitry of fluid satiation.Physiological reports · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the mechanism of unexplained hyponatremia and primary polydipsia in schizophrenia and its relationship to the underlying psychiatric illness.
methodsBriefly review previous studies that led to the conclusion the hyponatremia reflects altered hippocampal inhibition of peripheral neuroendocrine secretion. In greater detail, present the evidence supporting the hypothesis that circuit dysfunction associated with the hyponatremia and the polydipsia contributes to the underlying mental disorder.
resultsPolydipsic patients with and without hyponatremia exhibit enhanced neuroendocrine responses to psychological stress in proportion to structural deformations on their anterior hippocampus, amygdala and anterior hypothalamus. Nonpolydipsic patients exhibit blunted responses and deformations on other hippocampal and amygdala surfaces. The deformations in polydipsic patients are also proportional to diminished peripheral oxytocin levels and impaired facial affect recognition that is reversed by intranasal oxytocin. The anterior hippocampus is at the hub of a circuit that modulates neuroendocrine and other responses to psychological stress and is implicated in schizophrenia. Preliminary data indicate that other measures of stress reactivity are also enhanced in polydipsics and that the functional connectivity of the hippocampus with the other structures in this circuitry differs in schizophrenia patients with and without polydipsia.
conclusionPolydipsia may identify a subset of schizophrenia patients whose enhanced stress reactivity contributes to their mental illness. Stress reactivity may be a symptom dimension of chronic psychosis that arises from circuit dysfunction that can be modeled in animals. Hence polydipsia could be a biomarker that helps to clarify the pathophysiology and heterogeneity of psychosis as well as identify novel therapies. Clinical investigators should consider obtaining indices of water balance, as these may help them unravel and more concisely interpret their findings. Basic researchers should assess if the polydipsic subset is a patient group particularly suitable to test hypotheses arising from their translational studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.