SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2014
Predictive value of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 expression for platinum-based chemotherapy and survival in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Excision Repair Cross-complementation Group 1 is a Prognostic Biomarker in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy.Chinese medical journal · 2016Pooled it
- Impact of Pharmacogenetic Markers on the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant FLOT Chemotherapy in Patients with Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Evidence for Diverse Prognosis in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: Solid, Pseudoendometrioid, and Transitional-Like; So-Called "SET Morphology" and Progesterone Receptor Status.Turk patoloji dergisi · 2022Article
- ERCC1, PARP-1, and AQP1 as predictive biomarkers in colon cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2020Article
- Prognostic Value of Excision Repair Cross-Complementing mRNA Expression in Gastric Cancer.BioMed research international · 2018Article
- Effects of taxol resistance gene 1 expression on the chemosensitivity of SGC-7901 cells to oxaliplatin.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2016Article
- Prognostic value of ERCC1 and ERCC2 gene polymorphisms in patients with gastric cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe predictive value of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) gene for survival and response to platinum-based chemotherapy in gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to clarify the precise estimation of the prognostic and predictive effect of ERCC1.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Wiley and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) before March 2014. Studies analyzing survival data and/or chemotherapy response in GC by ERCC1 status were identified. The principal outcome measures were hazard ratios (HRs) for survival and relative risks (RRs) for chemotherapy response. Pooled HRs and RRs were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models according to the heterogeneity.
resultsTwenty-one studies involving 1,628 patients met our inclusion criteria. High ERCC1 expression was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS) and lower response to chemotherapy in advanced GC patients receiving palliative chemotherapy (HR 1.83; 95 % CI 1.45-2.31; P < 0.001; RR 0.49; 95 % CI 0.38-0.62; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in survival between high and low ERCC1 expression in adjuvant setting (OS: HR 1.38; 95 % CI 0.77-2.45; P = 0.276; EFS 0.72; 95 % CI 0.38-1.33; P = 0.291). Some evidence of heterogeneity and possible publication bias were discovered in few meta-analyses.
conclusionsHigh ERCC1 expression might be an adverse prognostic and a drug-resistance predictive factor for advanced GC patients. However, further studies with consistent ERCC1 assessment methodology are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.