Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24993934›Full record

Trial reportClinical genitourinary cancer2015

A phase II study of GW786034 (pazopanib) with or without bicalutamide in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Srikala S Sridhar, Anthony M Joshua, Richard Gregg, Christopher M Booth, Nevin Murray, Jovana Golubovic, Lisa Wang, Pamela Harris, Kim N Chi

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Srikala S SridharPrincess Margaret Hospital, Phase II Consortium, Toronto, ON.
Anthony M JoshuaPrincess Margaret Hospital, Phase II Consortium, Toronto, ON.
Richard GreggDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
Christopher M BoothDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
Nevin MurrayBC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC.
Jovana GolubovicPrincess Margaret Hospital, Phase II Consortium, Toronto, ON.
Lisa WangPrincess Margaret Hospital, Phase II Consortium, Toronto, ON.
Pamela HarrisCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Kim N ChiBC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC. Electronic address: kchi@bccancer.bc.ca.
Princess Margaret Hospital · NZBC Cancer Agency · CAQueen's University · CANational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Melanie Funes · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
NCI NIH HHS N01 CM062203NCI NIH HHS N01CM17107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPazopanib is an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In this randomized, open label phase II study, pazopanib alone or in combination with bicalutamide was evaluated in patients with chemotherapy-naive castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients received either pazopanib 800 mg daily (arm A) or pazopanib 800 mg plus bicalutamide 50 mg daily (arm B). A 2-stage study design was used, and the primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (defined as a confirmed ≥ 50% decline from baseline).

resultsA total of 23 patients (arm A, 10; arm B, 13) were accrued. The main grade 3+ toxicities were hypertension, fatigue, decreased lymphocytes, and increased alanine transaminase. Owing to significant toxicity, the protocol was amended after the first 11 patients and the pazopanib starting dose was reduced to 600 mg daily. In arm A, of 9 evaluable patients, there was 1 patient (11%) with a PSA response, 3 (33%) with stable PSA, and 5 (56%) with PSA progression; in arm B, of 12 evaluable patients, there were 2 patients (17%) with PSA responses, 6 (50%) with stable PSA, and 4 (33%) with PSA progression. Median progression-free survival was similar in both arms at 7.3 months (95% CI, 2.5 months to not reached). Long-term stable disease was seen in 4 patients who remained on treatment for 18 months (arm A), 26 months (arm A), 35 months (arm B), and 52 months (arm B).

conclusionIn this unselected patient population, pazopanib either alone or in combination with bicalutamide failed to show sufficient activity to warrant further evaluation. However, 4 patients had long-term benefit, suggesting that targeting the VEGFR pathway may still be relevant in selected patients and emphasizing the need for improved predictive markers for patients with CRPC.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnilidesAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDrug Administration ScheduleHumansIndazolesKallikreinsMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantPyrimidinesAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnilidesAntineoplastic AgentsbicalutamideIndazolesKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanNitrilespazopanibProstate-Specific AntigenPyrimidinesSulfonamidesTosyl CompoundsAngiogenesis inhibitorsCRPCPatient selectionPSA response

Identifiers

PMID24993934
PMCPMC4259891
OpenAlexW2023072606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.