Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24993769›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2014

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of VAsopressin versus Noradrenaline as Initial therapy in Septic sHock (VANISH).

Anthony C Gordon, Alexina J Mason, Gavin D Perkins, Deborah Ashby, Stephen J Brett

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06934798 (Inotropic Effects of Vasopressin Versus Noradrenaline In Patients With Vasoplegic Syndrome After Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06934798 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Inotropic Effects of Vasopressin Versus Noradrenaline In Patients With Vasoplegic Syndrome After Cardiac Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2024 to 2025Enrolled350ConditionsVasoplegic Syndrome of Cardiac SurgeryArmsVasopressin intravenous infusion, Norepinephrine intravenous infusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vasopressors for hypotensive shock.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Corticosteroids for treating sepsis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. What's new in vasopressin?Intensive care medicine · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony C GordonSection of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK Centre for Perioperative Medicine and Critical Care Research, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Alexina J MasonImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Gavin D PerkinsWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Deborah AshbyImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Stephen J BrettCentre for Perioperative Medicine and Critical Care Research, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBHeart of England NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR/CS/009/007Department of Health PB-PG-0610-22350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVasopressin is an alternative vasopressor in the management of septic shock. It spares catecholamine use but whether it improves outcome remains uncertain. Current evidence suggests that it may be most effective if used early and possibly in conjunction with corticosteroids. This trial will compare vasopressin to noradrenaline as initial vasopressor in the management of adult septic shock and investigate whether there is an interaction of vasopressin with corticosteroids. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, factorial (2×2), randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 412 patients will be recruited from multiple UK intensive care units and randomised to receive vasopressin (0-0.06 U/min) or noradrenaline (0-12 µg/min) as a continuous intravenous infusion as initial vasopressor therapy. If maximum infusion rates of this first study drug are reached, the patient will be treated with either hydrocortisone (initially 50 mg intravenous bolus six-hourly) or placebo, before additional open-label catecholamine vasopressors are prescribed. The primary outcome of the trial will be the difference in renal failure-free days between treatment groups. Secondary outcomes include need for renal replacement therapy, survival rates, other organ failures and resource utilisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial protocol and information sheets have received a favourable opinion from the Oxford A Research Ethics Committee (12/SC/0014). There is an independent Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee and independent membership of the Trial Steering Committee including patient and public involvement. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 20769191 and EudraCT 2011-005363-24.

Indexed as

Double-Blind MethodHumansNorepinephrineProspective StudiesResearch DesignShock, SepticVasoconstrictor AgentsVasopressinsNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsVasopressinsStatistics & Research Methods

Identifiers

PMID24993769
PMCPMC4091463
OpenAlexW2111351132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.