Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24993660›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2015

Effect of nasal sprays on an in vitro survival and morphology of nasoseptal cartilage.

Katharina Stoelzel, Benjamin Kohl, Mariann Hoyer, Carola Meier, Agnieszka J Szczepek, Heidi Olze, Gundula Schulze-Tanzil

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharina StoelzelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Campus Charité Mitte, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. katharina.stoelzel@charite.de.
Benjamin KohlDepartment of Orthopedic, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Garystrasse 5, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Mariann HoyerDepartment of Orthopedic, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Garystrasse 5, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Carola MeierDepartment of Orthopedic, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Garystrasse 5, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Agnieszka J SzczepekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Campus Charité Mitte, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Heidi OlzeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Campus Charité Mitte, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Gundula Schulze-TanzilDepartment of Orthopedic, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Garystrasse 5, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasal sprays were introduced several years ago to support the treatment of allergic rhinitis. These sprays may come in direct contact with directly exposed nasoseptal cartilage (e.g. is case of nasoseptal perforation). To date, no studies investigated the effects of nasal sprays on cartilage tissues and cells. Therefore, our aim was to analyze the influence of two different nasal spray types (thixotropic and liposomal) on the vitality of nasoseptal chondrocytes. Human chondrocytes were isolated from surgically dissected tissues. Alternatively, nasal septa (porcine and human) tissue explants were used. The cell or explant cultures were treated with nasal sprays for 4-24 h. As a read-out, cell vitality and gene and protein expression profiles of type I and II collagen, SOX 9 and matrix metalloproteinase MMP-1 were compared to the untreated controls by means of real-time RT-PCR and immunostaining. Using the liposomal, but not thixotropic nasal spray in an explant or chondrocyte in vitro culture led to increased cell death, as compared to the untreated controls. A trend towards suppression of type II collagen and SOX 9 on protein level was found in cultures exposed to liposomal nasal spray, as compared to the controls. The thixotropic nasal spray has not affected the nasoseptal chondrocytes. Further studies with the use of viable nasoseptal cartilage explants and particularly using an in vivo animal model of exposed nasoseptal cartilage are necessary to clear the effect of liposomal spray on chondrocytes.

Indexed as

CartilageChondrocytesAnimalsAnti-Allergic AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBentoniteCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCollagen Type IIDrug CarriersEthylene GlycolsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesLiposomesMatrix Metalloproteinase 1MentholAnti-Allergic AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBentoniteCollagen Type IIDrug CarriersEthylene GlycolsLiposomesMatrix Metalloproteinase 1MentholNasal SpraysphenoxyethanolPolysaccharides, BacterialSOX9 protein, humanSOX9 Transcription FactorVitaminsxanthan gum

Identifiers

PMID24993660
OpenAlexW2050589359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.