Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24993568›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2015

MRI evaluation of a collagen meniscus implant: a systematic review.

Stefano Zaffagnini, Alberto Grassi, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Tommaso Bonanzinga, Marco Nitri, Federico Raggi, Giovanni Ravazzolo, Maurilio Marcacci

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. No differences in clinical outcome between CMI and Actifit meniscal scaffolds: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Allografts for partial meniscus repair: anFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Polyurethane scaffold implants for partial meniscus lesions: delayed intervention leads to an inferior outcome.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
  11. A professional athlete functionally active 10 years after an arthroscopic lateral collagen meniscus implant.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Ongoing MRI remodeling 3-7 years after collagen meniscus implantation in stable knees.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Treatment options for the symptomatic post-meniscectomy knee.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefano ZaffagniniClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II - Lab. di Biomeccanica, ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. s.zaffagnini@biomec.ior.it.
Alberto GrassiClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II - Lab. di Biomeccanica, ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Giulio Maria Marcheggiani MuccioliClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II - Lab. di Biomeccanica, ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Tommaso BonanzingaClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II - Lab. di Biomeccanica, ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Marco NitriClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II - Lab. di Biomeccanica, ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Federico RaggiClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II - Lab. di Biomeccanica, ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanni RavazzoloClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II - Lab. di Biomeccanica, ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Maurilio MarcacciClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II - Lab. di Biomeccanica, ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGood clinical results have been demonstrated in numerous clinical studies using the collagen meniscus implant (CMI); however, the MRI behaviour of the scaffold, evaluated with Genovese score, is limited to a few cases series. The purpose was to evaluate, using the Genovese score, the MRI behaviour of the CMI at different follow-up periods and investigate possible differences in the behaviour of lateral and medial CMI.

methodsA comprehensive search was performed on PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase and Google Scholar databases using various combinations of the following keywords: "collagen meniscus implant" or "collagen meniscal implant". All the studies evaluating medial or lateral CMI using Genovese score for MRI were included in the systematic review.

resultsSix studies have been included in the systematic review, with no RCT's. The pooled number of patients involved in CMI surgery was 194 (83 % medial and 17 % lateral), with a mean age at surgery of 37.7 years. Concomitant procedures raged from 11 to 52 %. CMI morphology was grade 1 in 0, 2.7, 5.9, 0, 16.7 %, respectively, at 6 months, 1, 2, 5, 10 years. It was grade 2 in 12.5, 60.9, 60.3, 74.4, 75 %, respectively, at 6 months, 1, 2, 5, 10 years and grade 3 in 87.5, 36.4, 33.8, 25.6, 8.3 % at the same time points. CMI signal intensity was grade 1 in 80, 18.2, 25, 11.1, 22.2 %, respectively, at 6 months, 1, 2, 5, 10 years. It was grade 2 in 20, 78.2, 54.7, 55.6, 66.7 %, respectively, at 6 months, 1, 2, 5, 10 years and grade 3 in 0, 3.6, 20.3, 33.3, 11.1 % at the same time points. Slight differences were found between medial and lateral CMI in size and signal intensity.

conclusionsHigher rates of scaffolds with reduced size and with an MRI signal intensity more similar to normal meniscus were reported at longer follow-up compared with initial evaluations. Correlation between MRI findings and gross CMI appearance has not been reported. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstheses and ImplantsCollagenHumansMenisci, TibialTissue ScaffoldsCollagenBiologicCollagen meniscus implantMagnetic resonanceScaffold

Identifiers

PMID24993568
OpenAlexW1998260259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.