What is new in the use of aminoglycosides in critically ill patients?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Quantification and Explanation of the Variability of First-Dose Amikacin Concentrations in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department: A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2021
   Trial
2. Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2020
   Article
3. Focus on adequate antimicrobial treatment and de-escalation in the ICU.Intensive care medicine · 2016
   Article
4. Focus on optimization of early antimicrobial therapy in ICU-acquired infections.Intensive care medicine · 2016
   Review
5. Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2014: III. Severe infections, septic shock, healthcare-associated infections, highly resistant bacteria, invasive fungal infections, severe viral infections, Ebola virus disease and paediatrics.Intensive care medicine · 2015
   Review
6. Propensity-based study of aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as