Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24993390›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2014

Coronary artery calcium quantification from contrast enhanced CT using gemstone spectral imaging and material decomposition.

Tobias A Fuchs, Julia Stehli, Svetlana Dougoud, Bert-Ram Sah, Sacha Bull, Olivier F Clerc, Mathias Possner, Ronny R Buechel, Oliver Gaemperli, Philipp A Kaufmann

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Dual-energy CT and coronary imaging.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Cardiovascular imaging 2014 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2015
    Review
  16. Dual-energy Computed Tomography in Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tobias A FuchsCardiac Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, NUK C 42, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Julia Stehli
Svetlana Dougoud
Bert-Ram Sah
Sacha Bull
Olivier F Clerc
Mathias Possner
Ronny R Buechel
Oliver Gaemperli
Philipp A Kaufmann
University Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the feasibility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) measurement from low-dose contrast enhanced coronary CT angiography (CCTA) as this may obviate the need for an unenhanced CT scan. 52 patients underwent unenhanced cardiac CT and prospectively ECG triggered contrast enhanced CCTA (Discovery HD 750, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). The latter was acquired in single-source dual-energy mode [gemstone spectral imaging (GSI)]. Virtual unenhanced images were generated from GSI CCTA by monochromatic image reconstruction of 70 keV allowing selective iodine material suppression. CAC scores from virtual unenhanced CT were compared to standard unenhanced CT including a linear regression model. After iodine subtraction from the contrast enhanced CCTA the attenuation in the ascending aorta decreased significantly from 359 ± 61 to 54 ± 8 HU (P < 0.001), the latter comparing well to the value of 64 ± 55 HU found in the standard unenhanced CT (P = ns) confirming successful iodine subtraction. After introducing linear regression formula the mean values for Agatston, Volume and Mass scores of virtual unenhanced CT were 187 ± 321, 72 ± 114 mm(3), and 27 ± 46 mg/cm(3), comparing well to the values from standard unenhanced CT (187 ± 309, 72 ± 110 mm(3), and 27 ± 45 mg/cm(3)) yielding an excellent correlation (r = 0.96, r = 0.96, r = 0.92; P < 0.001). Mean estimated radiation dose revealed 0.83 ± 0.02 mSv from the unenhanced CT and 1.70 ± 0.53 mSv from the contrast enhanced CCTA. Single-source dual-energy scanning with GSI allows CAC quantification from low dose contrast enhanced CCTA by virtual iodine contrast subtraction.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedCardiac-Gated Imaging TechniquesContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsElectrocardiographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPredictive Value of TestsContrast MediaiodixanolTriiodobenzoic Acids

Identifiers

PMID24993390
OpenAlexW1974072609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.