Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24992895›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2014

Feasibility study of personalized peptide vaccination for metastatic recurrent triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Ryuji Takahashi, Uhi Toh, Nobutaka Iwakuma, Miki Takenaka, Hiroko Otsuka, Mina Furukawa, Teruhiko Fujii, Naoko Seki, Akihiko Kawahara, Masayoshi Kage and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Breast Cancer Treatments: Updates and New Challenges.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryuji Takahashi
Uhi Toh
Nobutaka Iwakuma
Miki Takenaka
Hiroko Otsuka
Mina Furukawa
Teruhiko Fujii
Naoko Seki
Akihiko Kawahara
Masayoshi Kage
Satoko Matsueda
Yoshito Akagi
Akira Yamada
Kyogo Itoh
Tetsuro Sasada
Kurume University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince treatment modalities for metastatic recurrent triple-negative breast cancer (mrTNBC) are limited, a novel treatment approach including immunotherapy is required. We have developed a novel regimen of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV), in which vaccine antigens are individually selected from a pool of different peptide candidates based on the pre-existing host immunity. Herein we conducted a phase II study of PPV for metastatic recurrent breast cancer patients to investigate the feasibility of PPV for mrTNBC.

methodsSeventy-nine patients with metastatic recurrent breast cancer who had metastases and had failed standard chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy were enrolled. They were subgrouped as the mrTNBC group (n = 18), the luminal/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative group (n = 41) and the HER2-positive group (n = 18), while the remaining two patients had not been investigated. A maximum of four human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched peptides showing higher peptide-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses in pre-vaccination plasma were selected from 31 pooled peptide candidates applicable for the four HLA-IA phenotypes (HLA-A2, -A24, or -A26 types, or HLA-A3 supertypes), and were subcutaneously administered weekly for 6 weeks and bi-weekly thereafter. Measurement of peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) and IgG responses along with other laboratory analyses were conducted before and after vaccination.

resultsNo severe adverse events associated with PPV were observed in any of the enrolled patients. Boosting of CTL and/or IgG responses was observed in most of the patients after vaccination, irrespective of the breast cancer subtypes. There were three complete response cases (1 mrTNBC and 2 luminal/HER2-negative types) and six partial response cases (1 mrTNBC and 5 luminal/HER2-negative types). The median progression-free survival time and median overall survival time of mrTNBC patients were 7.5 and 11.1 months, while those of luminal/HER2-negative patients were 12.2 and 26.5 months, and those of HER2-positive patients were 4.5 and 14.9 months, respectively.

conclusionsPPV could be feasible for mrTNBC patients because of the safety, immune responses, and possible clinical benefits. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000001844 (Registration Date: April 5, 2009).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCancer VaccinesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHLA-A AntigensHumansImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralImmunotherapyMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPeptidesAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesHLA-A AntigensPeptides

Identifiers

PMID24992895
PMCPMC4227005
OpenAlexW2096038417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.